|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Would someone please resend Ira's post on Spot Gold with his JPG to me
privately. I accidentally deleted it. Thanks for help in advance.
Have a good one
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Charles Meyer
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:23 AM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RT] Spot Gold
Don-
Wow, passionate work here. I see your projection (down to
circa 700) is also a lot lower.
In the spirit of sharing here is something addition on
e-wave to keep you busy.
I truly appreciate you sharing your work.
Best regards,
Chas
http://news.goldseek.com/AlfField/1209648332.php
On Wed, 14 May 2008 07:36:34 -0500
"Don Ewers" <dewers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chas,
> I would like to update my ZGM8 chart.
>
> When I ran the GCM8 it changed the start of Wave 1
>forward in time, to a place I find much more acceptable.
> In retrospect, the positioning of Wave 1 on the ZGM8
>chart is incorrect, something I have complained about to
>Esignal (this did not use to happen before). If you look
>carefully at the chart I posted on May 12 the Wave 2 is
>lower than Wave 1. It should not have started the count
>there. I can force the counts starting point to move and
>I have done so on the attached chart of ZGM8. It is now
>much more in agreement with the GCM8 chart as far as the
>PTI . PTI of 12 on the ZGM8 (vs. the prior posted 34)
>and PTI of 16 on the GCM8. Both charts are attached.
>
> A low PTI 's like this most certainly put the (1) double
>top or (2) failed 5th wave (no new high) into play.
> Don Ewers
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Don Ewers
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Spot Gold
>
>
>
> The PTI is just below it currently, 34.
>
> I also would note that the 10/70 oscillator has "lost
>control" (dropped below the zero line in excess of 40% of
>the up rise in the oscillator). This is normally a
>warning sign that the profit taking is abnormal (normal
>would be a correction), so this could lead to lower
>prices. I would start putting validity to the 1 & the 2
>of the "1" or A and "2" or B at this point. If true, we
>are currently in minor wave 2 of large wave 3,
>potentially? Since we are going to be moving to the next
>gold contract, I would want to see if it is telling a
>similar story at this point.
> Don Ewers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Charles Meyer
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Spot Gold
>
>
> Don-
>
> Can you update us as to the level of the PTI? Has it
> gone below 35? Tks for any feedback.
>
> Chas
> ----
>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:20:28 -0500
> "Don Ewers" <dewers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Chas,
> > I am in the AGET long term count since the 5/35
> >oscillator, in the current wave 4 pullback, exceeded
>the
> >-1.40 level below the zero line, signaling a switch
>to
> >longer term count and the 10/70 oscillator (see
>attached,
> >I added them).
> > Don Ewers
> >
> >FYI - I don't know if you respect D. Gartman or not,
>but
> >he sold his long gold position last week in the mid
> >$920's and he is now bearish gold. To use his words
>today
> >"GOLD'S ETF:GLD:The Early Stages Of A Bear Move Of
>Some
> >Very Real Consequence?
> >
> > Carl Futia is calling for a move to 780-800 also?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Charles Meyer
> > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:39 AM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Spot Gold
> >
> >
> > Don wrote:
> >
> > "AGET's PTI (profit taking index) is very close to
> >sending
> > warning for (1) a double top in the pattern ( a
>move up
> >in
> > a wave 5 will double top) or (2) a failed 5th wave
> > (meaning B was a "failed fifth" wave up). Time to
>be
> > careful with this puppy?"
> >
> > -----------------
> >
> > What time period do these price patterns cover? I'm
> > getting a different count? Tks for any comments.
> >
> > Chas
> > -----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1400 -
> >Release Date: 4/27/2008 9:39 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 -
>Release Date: 5/10/2008 11:12 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1428 -
>Release Date: 5/12/2008 7:44 AM
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1432 - Release Date: 5/14/2008
7:49 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1432 - Release Date: 5/14/2008
7:49 AM
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:realtraders-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:realtraders-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|