And if he had given us the web site as I requested rather than paste the
whole outside opinion in his mail, you couldn't have gone to that link and
read it there? If people on this list want to vote on issues like this,
I'll set up the poll on the web site. I am trying to run the list how I
perceive most of you want it run and if I'm wrong sometimes, I'll sure correct
it once I'm told you want something else. In the mean time, if Jeff or
anyone else feels they can do a better job of managing RealTraders, let me
know and we'll vote on that change as well.
I made a rule about
pasting outside mails to the list and two days later that fellow does exactly
that. Now, you mail and make it seem that he was removed for no reason
which will make people timid to post. There are some who want me to
moderate the list. ie: They want me to read every post before they
are released to the membership to make certain they comply with our posting
guidelines. I have resisted that to keep the information flow open and
uninterrupted and you now accuse me of stifling that very posting
freedom.
Bob
Bob
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2008, you
wrote:
This
is really bad. Somebody just got removed for posting a nice article
for me to read.!!! BobKC , your rules I?m sorry to say are very
wrong. No wonder, no one wants to post anything here ever again.
Just ridiculous!!.
Have a good one
Jeff
Harteam
Hong Kong
-----Original Message-----
From:
realtraders@yahoogroups.com [
mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Pardo at Mindspring
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:13
AM
To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again -
member dropped / ?
Is the reason for the ban on
these articles because of the potential for useless or agenda bearing
content?
Regards,
Bob
From: realtraders@yahoogroups.com [
mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
BobsKC
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:54 PM
To:
realtraders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry
for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again - member
dropped
I too was interested in the article and I read
it. I would have also read it had there been a link to it posted
rather than embedding it.
Bob
At 05:35 PM 3/27/2008, you
wrote:
- Having worked with John many years ago at Salamon Brothers, I was very
interested in the story.
- I personally have no objection to good quality material like this
being posted to the group.
- Regards,
- Bob Pardo
- From: realtraders@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Mark Simms
- Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:55 PM
- To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again - member dropped
- Can someone tell me what the difference is between placing a LINK into
the email message
- versus the embedded FULL TEXT ?
- No difference IMHO except that the embedded technique is more
convenient.
- From: realtraders@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:realtraders@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Clyde Lee(swb)
- Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:21 PM
- To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again
- Bob,
- Even though you don't like the idea it seems
- that in the short run you may have to go to
- monitoring messages since your sense of
- the behavior of members does not seem to
- be correct ! ! !
- Clyde
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Deosaran Bisnath
- To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
- Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:50 PM
- Subject: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble
Again
-
A Decade Later,
-
John Meriwether
-
Must Scramble
Again
- LTCM Founder Has Tough Time
- Stemming Losses at New Funds;
- A Withdrawal Deadline Nears
- By JENNY STRASBURG