|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
And if he had given us the web site as I requested rather than paste the
whole outside opinion in his mail, you couldn't have gone to that link
and read it there? If people on this list want to vote on issues
like this, I'll set up the poll on the web site. I am trying to run
the list how I perceive most of you want it run and if I'm wrong
sometimes, I'll sure correct it once I'm told you want something
else. In the mean time, if Jeff or anyone else feels they can do a
better job of managing RealTraders, let me know and we'll vote on that
change as well.
I made a rule about pasting outside mails to the list and two days later
that fellow does exactly that. Now, you mail and make it seem that
he was removed for no reason which will make people timid to post.
There are some who want me to moderate the list. ie: They
want me to read every post before they are released to the membership to
make certain they comply with our posting guidelines. I have
resisted that to keep the information flow open and uninterrupted and you
now accuse me of stifling that very posting freedom.
Bob
Bob
At 10:16 PM 3/27/2008, you wrote:
This is really bad. Somebody just got removed for posting a nice
article for me to read.!!! BobKC , your rules I?m sorry to say are
very wrong. No wonder, no one wants to post anything here ever
again. Just ridiculous!!.
Have a good one
Jeff Harteam
Hong Kong
-----Original Message-----
From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Pardo
at Mindspring
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:13 AM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again - member dropped / ?
Is the reason
for the ban on these articles because of the potential for useless or
agenda bearing content?
Regards,
Bob
From:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BobsKC
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:54 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again - member dropped
I too was interested in the article
and I read it. I would have also read it had there been a link to
it posted rather than embedding it.
Bob
At 05:35 PM 3/27/2008, you wrote:
- Having worked with John many years ago at Salamon Brothers, I was
very interested in the story.
-
- I personally have no objection to good quality material like this
being posted to the group.
-
- Regards,
-
- Bob Pardo
-
- From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Simms
- Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:55 PM
- To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again - member dropped
-
- Can someone tell me what the difference is between placing a LINK
into the email message
- versus the embedded FULL TEXT ?
-
- No difference IMHO except that the embedded technique is more
convenient.
-
-
- From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clyde Lee(swb)
- Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:21 PM
- To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again
- Bob,
- Even though you don't like the idea it seems
- that in the short run you may have to go to
- monitoring messages since your sense of
- the behavior of members does not seem to
- be correct ! ! !
-
- Clyde
-
-
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Deosaran Bisnath
- To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:50 PM
- Subject: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must
Scramble Again
-
A Decade Later,
John Meriwether
Must Scramble
Again
-
- LTCM Founder Has Tough Time
- Stemming Losses at New Funds;
- A Withdrawal Deadline Nears
- By JENNY STRASBURG
__._,_.___
![]()
__,_._,___
|