[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again - member dropped / ?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

This is the first list I joined and came across some very generous people here who set me on the on the path of learning whatever I know of trading. While some of them are still here , the list is not even an iota  of what it was. Part of the credit for the list's demise rests squarely on [a]  those who tried to abuse it for commercial purposes and [b] those who could not appreciate the merit of the posts of the members who were also vendors of products/services abd disrespected such members. Part of the credit I am afraid goes to absolute lack of leadership in those who have been entrusted with minding this group. The wealth of knowledge that still exists in the senior membership of this list has been allowed to go waste.
 
R

Jeffrey Harteam <jharteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is really bad.  Somebody just got removed for posting a nice article for me to read.!!!  BobKC , your rules I?m sorry to say are very wrong.  No wonder, no one wants to post anything here ever again.  Just ridiculous!!.
 
Have a good one
Jeff Harteam
Hong Kong
 
-----Original Message-----
From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Pardo at Mindspring
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:13 AM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again - member dropped / ?
 
Is the reason for the ban on these articles because of the potential for useless or agenda bearing content?
 
Regards,
 
Bob
 
From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BobsKC
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:54 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again - member dropped
 
I too was interested in the article and I read it.  I would have also read it had there been a link to it posted rather than embedding it.

Bob

At 05:35 PM 3/27/2008, you wrote:
Having worked with John many years ago at Salamon Brothers, I was very interested in the story.
 
I personally have no objection to good quality material like this being posted to the group.
 
Regards,
 
Bob Pardo
 
From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Simms
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:55 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again - member dropped
 
Can someone tell me what the difference is between placing a LINK into the email message
versus the embedded FULL TEXT ?
 
No difference IMHO except that the embedded technique is more convenient.
 
 

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clyde Lee(swb)
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:21 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again
Bob,
Even though you don't like the idea it seems
that in the short run you may have to go to
monitoring messages since your sense of
the behavior of members does not seem to
be correct ! ! !
 
Clyde
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:50 PM
Subject: [RT] Not merry for Meriwether - John Meriwether Must Scramble Again
 

A Decade Later,

John Meriwether

Must Scramble Again

 
LTCM Founder Has Tough Time
Stemming Losses at New Funds;
A Withdrawal Deadline Nears
By JENNY STRASBURG
 


Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___