My XP Pro uses 16 gigs just fine. Must be the
64 bit
version. I had it fitted by a firm that specializes in
financial software and cad design.
Tim
--- Robert Pardo at Mindspring <rep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>
>
> XP Pro can only use 3 GB of Memory. Why 16 GB?
>
>
>
> Do you have the 64 bit version?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Bob Pardo
>
>
>
> From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Timothy Morge
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:46 AM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [RT] Quad Core vs Dual Core for TS
> 2000i
>
>
>
> XP Pro 2 service pack 2...Vista is junk, not ready
> for
> prime time, sadly.
> --- Robert Pardo at Mindspring <rep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:rep%40mindspring.com> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> >
> >
> > >16 Gigs on
> > the other.<
> >
> >
> >
> > What OS are you running?
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Bob Pardo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:realtraders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:realtraders%40yahoogroups.com>
> ] On
> > Behalf Of Timothy Morge
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:07 AM
> > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:realtraders%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Quad Core vs Dual Core for TS
> > 2000i
> >
> >
> >
> > I run both. The quads I run are expensive but they
> > scream and I can do several high-end charting
> > packages
> > at once plus run a virtual conference session
> going
> > and not even break a sweat on the quads.
> >
> > The dual core are fast but not in the same league.
> > No
> > matter what you do, get LOTS of RAM. to me, 2 Gigs
> > is
> > a minimum and I have 8 Gigs on one quad and 16
> Gigs
> > on
> > the other.
> >
> > Tim Morge
> >
> > www.marketgeometry.com
> >
> > --- Hinton Clabaugh <hgciii@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:hgciii%40gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hgciii%40gmail.com> > wrote:
> >
> > > I remember that TS 2000 was written to take
> > > advantage of two processors. Now
> > > that the quad cores are inexpensive, I was
> > wondering
> > > if there would be any
> > > real advantage to them over the dual cores. I
> > > suppose having seperate CPUs
> > > for GlobalServer, charting and Windows would
> > > theoretically be better. Any
> > > opinions? Thanks.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>