XP Pro 2 service pack 2...Vista is junk, not
ready for
prime time, sadly.
--- Robert Pardo at Mindspring <rep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>
>
> >16 Gigs on
> the other.<
>
>
>
> What OS are you running?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Bob Pardo
>
>
>
>
>
> From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Timothy Morge
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:07 AM
> To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RT] Quad Core vs Dual Core for TS
> 2000i
>
>
>
> I run both. The quads I run are expensive but they
> scream and I can do several high-end charting
> packages
> at once plus run a virtual conference session going
> and not even break a sweat on the quads.
>
> The dual core are fast but not in the same league.
> No
> matter what you do, get LOTS of RAM. to me, 2 Gigs
> is
> a minimum and I have 8 Gigs on one quad and 16 Gigs
> on
> the other.
>
> Tim Morge
>
> www.marketgeometry.com
>
> --- Hinton Clabaugh <hgciii@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:hgciii%40gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> > I remember that TS 2000 was written to take
> > advantage of two processors. Now
> > that the quad cores are inexpensive, I was
> wondering
> > if there would be any
> > real advantage to them over the dual cores. I
> > suppose having seperate CPUs
> > for GlobalServer, charting and Windows would
> > theoretically be better. Any
> > opinions? Thanks.
> >
>
>
>
>