I run both. The quads I run are expensive but
they
scream and I can do several high-end charting packages
at once plus run a virtual conference session going
and not even break a sweat on the quads.
The dual core are fast but not in the same league. No
matter what you do, get LOTS of RAM. to me, 2 Gigs is
a minimum and I have 8 Gigs on one quad and 16 Gigs on
the other.
Tim Morge
www.marketgeometry.com
--- Hinton Clabaugh <hgciii@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I remember that TS 2000 was written to take
> advantage of two processors. Now
> that the quad cores are inexpensive, I was wondering
> if there would be any
> real advantage to them over the dual cores. I
> suppose having seperate CPUs
> for GlobalServer, charting and Windows would
> theoretically be better. Any
> opinions? Thanks.
>