| 
 Hello Charles 
  
My original  volume study  show that just 
taking the up volume each day and deducting the down volume (cumulative)  
will show the overall trend in the market, 
later I refined it to only add volume to cumulative 
if the close is above open  and  up volume is above down 
volume, 
when trying to apply it to intra day trading, i.e. 
nq or es, I find it leading by 10-15 min 
and had large dd  (4-6 points before making 
4-6 points) 
to refine things 
I took  up volume/up issues minus  down 
volume/down issues 
that did a MUCH  better job with less  dd 
and same good results 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:23 
  AM 
  Subject: Re: [RT] PROGRAM TRADING 
  
  
  Alex- 
    
  Looks like you've thought about this issue 
  too?  Tks for your response.  Perhaps the best I can do is to FORGET 
  ABOUT 
  making an issue of trying to use volume as an 
  indicator.  Wordon wrote a great paper (I no longer have a copy) about 
  why 
  his tick volume made it's way onto 
  the rubbish heap of volume indicators; expecially as applied to the 
  overall market and 
  indexes.  The service his sons run I think are still big on volume regards 
  individual stocks.   I don't do individual stocks. 
    
  BTW; does anyone know where I can run this by Ben 
  of RT fame?  I think volume is important in his decision making.  
   
    
  Chas 
  
    ----- Original Message -----  
    
    
    Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:58 
    AM 
    Subject: RE: [RT] PROGRAM TRADING 
    
  Pure volume has very little meaning for the reasons you 
    state.  In stocks it has been quite some time since you could get 
    genuine directional volume data.  It's worse in derivates where 
    probably two thirds of the trading is hedge relayed.  Some people try 
    to filter back to public only, but that data is rarely 
    realtime.
 
  -----Original Message----- From: Charles Meyer 
    [mailto:chaze@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Wed 2/2/2005 9:55 AM To: REAL 
    TRADERS Subject: [RT] PROGRAM TRADING   Group-
  I was 
    wondering if I can get some feedback on the subject of program trading; as 
    it relates to volume analysis.  I've been doing a lot of studying on 
    this subject and here's the issue.  In the old days; total volume of 
    shares traded was just that; insofaras it accounted for all the exchange 
    trading.  Today; end of day volume of shares traded on both the NYSE 
    and the NASDAQ is greatly influenced by program trading.  It is said to 
    account for about an estimated 50% of all volume.  Stated simply; 
    program trading greatly influences total volume.  Now; it seems to me 
    this has to greatly impact the INTERPRETATION OF VOLUME BASED INDICATORS; 
    because we are no longer seeing the pure forces of supply and demand as in 
    the days when program trading didn't exist? 
  To further complicate 
    matters (if it is necessary to do so; but I am getting ahead of myself here) 
    of all program trading; only 10% is the index arb variety where stocks 
    are sold; and futures are bought simultaneously; and vice versa.  
    However; there are OTHER and perhaps MORE IMPORTANT types of program 
    trading strategies which must impact the analysis of supply and demand 
    vis a via volume based indicators?  If I may provide an example.  
    Last Friday sell programs drove the Dow down about 50-points when sell price 
    levels were hit and program trading came into the market.  For 
    DAYTRADING purposes this was valuable information since one could have front 
    run these orders on the short side.  However; on some days one would 
    lose money and the correct strategy would be to fade a sell program by 
    buying into the market at those levels and times. 
  Daytrading impact 
    aside; is there a way to modify volume based indicators which would provide 
    a clearer representation of pure supply/demand market generated 
    information for the purposes of swing and end of day trading?  If 
    someone could please share their experiences and there are no answers to 
    this dilema; it will at least save me a lot of wasted time and energy 
    trodding a worthless path.  
  If you have been with me this far; 
    thank you for your time and attention; and any 
    feedback.
  Chas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  for by program 
    trading 
 
 
 
  ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
    --------------------~-->  In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own 
    computers. At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide! http://us.click.yahoo.com/EpW3eD/3MnJAA/cosFAA/zMEolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 
    
    Yahoo! Groups Links
  <*> To visit your group 
    on the web, go to:     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
  <*> 
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:     realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  <*> 
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/   
    
      
    Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG 
    Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 
    1/16/2005
  
  
    
  No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG 
  Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 
  1/31/2005
  
 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links 
 |