|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
If you do not already have an antivirus program
already installed you can get one here free
<A
href="">http://www.grisoft.com
This product AVG can be set to update itself and is
quite decent. You can have it up and running in about 10 minutes. While it
is free to North American customers it is NOT free to other areas e.g. Europe.
If you use it make sure that you have it set to check your emails and to update
itself and scan your computer automatically. I have it running in the middle of
the night when it takes about 40 minutes to scan a 40gig computer. No problems
in several years of use
If you want a quick free online scan to see if you
are infected there are several choices including
- Trendmicro housecall at <A
href="">http://housecall.trendmicro.com/
- pcpitstop at <A
href="">http://pcpitstop.com/antivirus/AV.asp
A pretty decent article on "safe computing" and
preventing email viruses is at <A
href="">http://www.yourtechonline.com/virus.shtml
If you are open to viruses you are also open to
trojans which can be a lot more insidious since they can capture your personal
information and I would suggest downloading at least a trial version of one of
the antitrojan software packages e.g.
ANTS - freeware at <A
href="">http://www.angelfire.com/comics/inferno/pops/ants.html
Tauscan - <A
href="">http://www.agnitum.com/. Has a free
trial
TDS3 - more thorough but also requires a higher
'geek quotient'. Has a 30 day trial at <A
href="">http://www.diamondcs.com.au/
Sygate, the makers of an excellent free software
firewall has an online trojan vulnerability scan at <A
href="">http://scan.sygatetech.com/trojanscan.html
This will tell you if ports used by common trojans are open on your machine and
alert you to possible infection
One other thing I use is software called RegProt
which runs in the background (using minimal resources) and which alerts you if
something is trying to write to your registry (which most viruses and trojans
and other 'malware' will attempt to do). It is from the same people that produce
TDS3 above and you can read about it and download it here:
<A
href="">http://www.diamondcs.com.au/web/htm/regprot.htm
Finally in your email program there is usually a
choice which to :
1. turn off the preview pane. In Outlook express
this is by going to View>Layout and unchecking the 'view preview pane' box.
Some viruses and scripts can execute just by opening them in the preview panel -
if this is unchecked you can examine the attachments before the message is
previewed
2. Stop your emailer, especialy OE which is often
the target of such virus attacks from sending email without your knowledge by
going to TOOLS>Options>Security and check the "warn if other program tries
to send email as me". Will make you aware if a virus is trying to send out to
people in your address book
3. If really paranoid, on this same 'Security" tab
check the box that says "do not allow attachments to be downloaded and opened
which could potentially be a virus. This will block just about everything but
the downside is that you cannot open many safe attachments without first
examining them and then unchecking the box. However within 5 minutes of a virus
being propogated someone on the list has alerted everyone and having this option
checked will allow you to delete the offending email with impunity. Later you
can go back and uncheck the box and download the attachments you need. I
personally do not use this since I have made myself pretty resistant to viruses,
trojans, scripts, scrap files etc (touch wood)
Hope that helps. With so much good freeware out
there there is absolutely no reason to put yourself at risk despite the
opinion of the propogator of this latest virus round. Be safe out there
:-)
Bob
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
<A title=grehert@xxxxxxxxx
href="">grehert@xxxxxxxxx
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:59
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Digest Number
1264
Apparently a virus has been disseminated
through this email list. Would someone advise the group how to check if
our individual computers are infected?
G. Rehert
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
<A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <A
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 3:54
AM
Subject: [RT] Digest Number 1264
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx------------------------------------------------------------------------There
are 9 messages in this issue.Topics in this
digest: 1. Re: Re: So when's the
low?/BOTTOM?
From: Dom Perrino <<A
href="">acutimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2. Fibonacci techniques for timing
markets
From: Neal Hughes <<A
href="">traderr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
3. Re: A very funny
website/virus
From: "erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<<A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
4. Security Alert -- massive flood against UPD port
1434 From:
Mark Jurik <<A
href="">mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
5. RE: Security Alert -- massive flood against UPD port 1434
(UPDATE)
From: Mark Jurik <<A
href="">mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
6. Re: A very funny
website/virus
From: "tradewynne <<A
href="">tradewynne@xxxxxxxxx>" <<A
href="">tradewynne@xxxxxxxxx>
7. Re: A very funny
website/virus
From: "Bob" <<A
href="">sampah2002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
8. Re: Re: So when's the
low?/BOTTOM?
From: BobsKC <<A
href="">bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
9. Re: [MedianLine] Constant Range Bars and
PF From:
"BobR" <<A
href="">bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
1 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:21:48 -0500
From: Dom Perrino <<A
href="">acutimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Re: Re: So when's the low?/BOTTOM?Bob, I did not
comment or respond to your below email. After thinking about it I came to
the conclusion that not to respond would not be appropriate as it would not
address the issue(s) that may have resulted in any misunderstanding(s) from
the exchange(s) between myself and Ben in the emails that culminated in your
below comment. In addition by not doing so I would be committing an act of
omission( looking the other way ). Acts of omissions have in history proven
as dangerous and many times even more dangerous than acts of commission. As
a result this response. Ben and I have been friends and now
each on personal basis for over twenty years.I first met Ben when I was a
stockbroker with a major NYC brokerage firm.He was a client of another
broker in that particular office where he would frequently stop in. We
became friends very quickly as we were both very interested in the stock
market and the commodities markets as well. In short I know Ben in the
person. I know his strong points and his weak points and he knows mine.
Friends also at times have disagreements. Most of our personal disagreements
are private. I have a tendency to be precise and exact. Ben has a tendency
not to be as exact. That could be due to the fact that I was previously in
the accounting field. In any event I made the mistake of not sending private
email this time. This may have caused him to lose his cool, which he rarely
does. But the main point, after giving this very brief background, is that I
never considered Ben as a second language person and still don't. When that
first surfaced on your below email I did not even know what you were talking
about. I am a good technical analysis person but not very good at computers
( that's Ben end, that's not to say he is not good at technical analysis ),
I thought you may have been referring to Computer Language. The idea of Ben
having English as a second language was never a problem with me. The problem
I did have and still do is his presentation of his material. It's all that
simple, this whole misunderstanding.Regards, Dom
Perrino<A
href="">dperrino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<A
href="">domperrino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message ----- From: BobsKC To: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:53 PM Subject: Re:
[RT] Re: So when's the low?/BOTTOM? Ben, (as he has said
many, many, times on this list), does not speak english as his first
language and I think that on rare occasion, people may misconstrue his
meaning. Even so, he is very generous to share his thoughts and to
some degree, his methodologies with the list on a regular basis. I am
sure he meant no insult to you. Earnings nailed the dead cat
bounce today but it is still due. Bob At
12:09 PM 1/22/2003 -0500, you wrote: No need to
get defensive. Not everyone has the system and keeping track of entries and
exit points would enhance understanding of each entry and exit point and
would show results in real time.
----- Original Message -----
From: profitok
To: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003
11:13 AM Subject: Re: [RT] Re: So
when's the low?/BOTTOM? the
profit taking index, the long term trading and the perfect
stop loss are tools, you need your brain to use the tools to
make a call see work doc in poor
English that tries to explain the
tools as for the
system I gave the free version
to hundreds of people and with
the GREAT feed back it is using YOUR suggestions that
contributes to IMPROVING the system
(for the next version) have a great
trading day
Ben ----- Original Message -----
From: Acutimer
To: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003
8:44 AM Subject: Re: [RT] Re: So
when's the low?/BOTTOM? If this
system is going to be in metastock,amibroker and ts is it going to be able
to change signals after reevaluating p/c ratio or other criteria after
signal is already given or is system not yet completed?
----- Original Message -----
From: profitok
To: <A
href="">wheelsinthesky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
ntt-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; <A
href="">panda2222@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:50
PM Subject: [RT] Re: So when's the
low?/BOTTOM? I was a little early
today to close 1/2 of my shorts at
895.3,, I have a gtc to buy the other
1/2 at 884.45,,to close rest of
shorts, there is a better than
80% probability we make a lower low
tomorrow, on the bottom of this
message are the profit taking index that says
:close your shorts(gif
z12103) long term trading says we
could go another 10-15 before a
bottom(gif
long12103) and the perfect stop
loss(gif showing lines lmn) is at the
following levels(gif
lmn12103) 900.65 buy to close
if 884.45 not met
901.75 go long 25%
910.05 go long 75%
911.80 long100% any
questions? all 3 propriety but avail
soon in metastock,amibroker and
TS
Ben <A
href="">profitok@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message ----- From:
<<A
href="">bltrading@xxxxxxx>
To: <<A
href="">wheelsinthesky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:33
PM Subject: [wheelsinthesky] So when's
the low? > I must have seen
at least a dozen posts predicting a low
between > Friday and Tuesday in the
890s. I don't have a timing cluster
until > this weekend but SPX883
sure has ALOT going for it. If that breaks
I > wouldn't expect 868 to
hold.
>
> > To unsubscribe from this
group, send an email to: > <A
href="">wheelsinthesky-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to <A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> To unsubscribe from this
group, send an email to: <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
an email to: <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to: <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT To unsubscribe from this
group, send an email to: <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------[This
message contained
attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
2 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:59:00 -0800
From: Neal Hughes <<A
href="">traderr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Fibonacci techniques for timing marketsHi RealTraders,The
following is educational content extracted from my website, contributed
here for your enjoyment... Although this example is an S&P trade
(e-mini), the techniques are transferable to stocks and other
instruments. This technique is best applied when there is ample
liquidity, and a good trend.This is not a "trading system", nor is
it perfect. It is one of several great entry/exit techniques that can
give you an edge in a trending market.There is more to trading than just
entry and exit techniques... My intention is not to outline a complete
trading methodology here.Best wishes as we approach some important
Fibonacci support areas in the markets next week!-Neal
Hughes.---------------------------"Trade of the day Fri Jan
24"We had more great trades in the chat room today. 20 points on NQ
overnight as well as 14.5 points on S&P, and similar on the Dow YM..
Well done Streeter!Today I want to focus on a follow-up on the
training seminar I did on Thursday. The entry rules were explained in
the seminar, and I was actually juggling this trade while preparing the
seminar for distribution.I don't expect anyone to jump into a trade
right after I've done a training session, but the entry was clear, and
the gains substantial.This seminar was for subscribers only, but
this trade-of-the-day will hi-light some of the key
principles.The over-all perspective is that we were in a down-trend
on the daily chart (MACD, RSI,etc), so looking to short the intra-day
chart. We resisted at a Fibonacci level, .618 at about 889 on the ES
chart. Shortly there-after the Stochastic fast line (blue) closed below
the slow line (red) triggering the entry, in the region of 885. My own
entry was more like 883 though, since I was juggling some conversations
and preparing a seminar...Intraday 15 minute chart:<<A
href="">http://www.fibmarkets.com/YaBBImages/Attachments/030124_es_tod_15.gif>The
seminar yesterday did not extend to exit rules, so the following is
unrelated to the seminar.One part of trading that traders
struggle with, is letting profits run. In this case, the 10-minute
Stochastic kept us in the trade all the way down to the bottom at 866.
See 10-minute chart for these details.. The exit area is marked on the
chart.Intraday 15 minute chart:<<A
href="">http://www.fibmarkets.com/YaBBImages/Attachments/030124_es_tod_10.gif>In
this case the market went on beyond the profit objective. This can
happen, and should be expected. It's not realistic to capture every
dollar of every move, especially with just one
technique..Another great day in the markets! Join us every day,
[reference to website and chat room deleted out of respect for
spam-sensitive list members].-Neal.[This message
contained
attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
3 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 13:20:18 -0500
From: "erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<<A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Re: A very funny website/virusOriginal
Message:-----------------From: Bob <A
href="">sampah2002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDate:
Sat, 25 Jan 2003 00:49:48 -0500To: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject:
Re: [RT] A very funny website/virus----- Original
Message -----From: <<A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
<<A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent:
Friday, January 24, 2003 10:14 PMSubject: Re: [RT] A very funny
website/virus>>> add my name back to the list, the
infected computer has been replaced.>After successfully
trading these markets for over 40 years, the cost of thecomputer is
irrelevant.> <A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <A
href="">ederdely@xxxxxxx>A good,
regularly update antivirus program is a LOT more cost effectivethan
replacing the computer . You can download a free one at<A
href="">www.grisoft.com. BobTo
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--------------------------------------------------------------------mail2web
- Check your email from the web at<A
href="">http://mail2web.com/
.________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
4 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:06:19 -0700
From: Mark Jurik <<A
href="">mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Security Alert -- massive flood against UPD port 1434Jan 25,
10am Sometime late lastnight my ATT cable shot up to 99%
utilization and continues to do so 10 hours later. On checking my firewall,
I discovered numerous computers trying to access UDP port 1434 on my
computer. Seems like a DDS attack gone amuck.If you have cable/DSL
and are always online without a firewall, you may want to get your O/S to
temporarily disable UDP port 1434. - mark
jurik=================================================================================PS
- Here is a sample of my firewall report:JAN 25 11:19:06 2003IP
Packet discarded from 209.202.216.54 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434
(UDP)JAN 25 11:13:56 2003IP Packet discarded from 130.243.8.153
to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 11:02:56 2003IP Packet
discarded from 216.148.227.68 to 12.254.77.80 for port 29493
(UDP)JAN 25 10:59:43 2003IP Packet discarded from 208.57.243.220
to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:49:51 2003IP Packet
discarded from 212.113.161.133 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434
(UDP)JAN 25 10:48:40 2003IP Packet discarded from 209.73.224.142
to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:46:41 2003IP Packet
discarded from 212.19.197.98 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN
25 10:43:39 2003IP Packet discarded from 65.163.241.18 to 12.254.77.80
for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:41:36 2003IP Packet discarded from
217.22.192.119 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:40:44
2003IP Packet discarded from 64.53.181.2 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434
(UDP)JAN 25 10:40:03 2003IP Packet discarded from
216.140.239.162 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:35:03
2003IP Packet discarded from 65.118.28.230 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434
(UDP)JAN 25 10:34:22 2003IP Packet discarded from 210.238.195.14
to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:31:10 2003IP Packet
discarded from 168.156.112.177 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434
(UDP)JAN 25 10:29:15 2003IP Packet discarded from 12.144.155.21
to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:29:08 2003IP Packet
discarded from 209.202.216.54 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434 (UDP)JAN
25 10:24:36 2003IP Packet discarded from 62.118.252.82 to 12.254.77.80
for port 1434 (UDP)JAN 25 10:23:44 2003IP Packet discarded from
218.30.21.201 to 12.254.77.80 for port 1434
(UDP)________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
5 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 11:26:58 -0700
From: Mark Jurik <<A
href="">mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject: RE:
Security Alert -- massive flood against UPD port 1434
(UPDATE)The UDP port 1434 attack seems to be directed at
servers.For more information on this and a significant security flaw
in Windows XP, go to Gibson Research site at ...<A
href="">http://grc.com/default.htm-
mark
jurik________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
6 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 20:06:09 -0000
From: "tradewynne <<A
href="">tradewynne@xxxxxxxxx>" <<A
href="">tradewynne@xxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Re: A very funny website/virus> After successfully trading
these markets for over 40 years, the cost of the computer is
irrelevant.> > erdely@x...>
> ederdely@x...We are all glad to
hear it, but the AV software may save otherstrouble: do you realize you
sent viruses to the entire list and probably everyone else in your
address book? There is a good chancesome of them who (like you) don't
have AV software will be sendingthis same virus back to you again and
again....unless you buy them newcomputers too ;-)....As Bob
said:You can download a free one at> <A
href="">www.grisoft.com.> >
BobOr you can flush money down to toilet, muck upthe list, and
your friends' and family's computers,for no good
reason....--- In <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"erdely@x..." <<A
href="">erdely@x...> wrote:> > >
Original Message:> -----------------> From: Bob <A
href="">sampah2002@x...> Date: Sat, 25 Jan
2003 00:49:48 -0500> To: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RT] A very funny website/virus> > >
> ----- Original Message -----> From: <<A
href="">erdely@x...>> To: <<A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:14 PM> Subject: Re: [RT] A very
funny website/virus> >> >> > add my name back
to the list, the infected computer has been replaced.>
>> > After successfully trading these markets for over 40
years, the cost of the> computer is irrelevant.> > <A
href="">erdely@x...> > <A
href="">ederdely@x...> >> > A
good, regularly update antivirus program is a LOT more cost
effective> than replacing the computer . You can download a free
one at> www.grisoft.com.>
> Bob> > > To unsubscribe from this group,
send an email to:> <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
<A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
-------------------------------------------------------------------->
mail2web - Check your email from the web at> <A
href="">http://mail2web.com/
.________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
7 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:50:18 -0500
From: "Bob" <<A
href="">sampah2002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Re: A very funny website/virusMaybe the cost to you of just
buying a new computer is "irrelevant".However what is the cost to others
on the list of this new, unprotectedcomputer potentially spreading
viruses again? Is that just asirrelevant? Do yourself and others a favor
and get an antivirus programand keep it
updated Bob----- Original Message -----From: <<A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
<<A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent:
Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:20 PMSubject: Re: [RT] A very funny
website/virus>>> Original Message:>
-----------------> From: Bob <A
href="">sampah2002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 00:49:48 -0500> To: <A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RT] A very funny
website/virus>>>> ----- Original Message
-----> From: <<A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> To:
<<A
href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:14 PM> Subject: Re: [RT] A very
funny website/virus> >> >> > add my name back
to the list, the infected computer has beenreplaced.>
>>> After successfully trading these markets for over 40
years, the costof the> computer is irrelevant.> > <A
href="">erdely@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > <A
href="">ederdely@xxxxxxx>
>>> A good, regularly update antivirus program is a LOT
more costeffective> than replacing the computer . You can
download a free one at> <A
href="">www.grisoft.com.>>
Bob>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:> <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to<A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------->
mail2web - Check your email from the web at> <A
href="">http://mail2web.com/
.>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:> <A
href="">realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to<A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
8 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:10:51 -0500
From: BobsKC <<A
href="">bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Re: Re: So when's the low?/BOTTOM?I did not and do not, doubt your
honor and lack of adversity in your original
post.BobAt 10:21 AM 1/25/2003 -0500, you
wrote:>Bob,> I did not comment or respond to
your below email. After thinking about i=>t I came to the conclusion
that not to respond would not be appropriate as =>it would not
address the issue(s) that may have resulted in any
misundersta=>nding(s) from the exchange(s) between myself and Ben in
the emails that cul=>minated in your below comment. In addition by
not doing so I would be commi=>tting an act of omission( looking the
other way ). Acts of omissions have i=>n history proven as dangerous
and many times even more dangerous than acts =>of commission. As a
result this response.> Ben and I have been friends
and now each on personal basis for over twen=>ty years.I first met
Ben when I was a stockbroker with a major NYC brokerag=>e firm.He was
a client of another broker in that particular office where
he=>>>WARNING: The remainder of this message has not
been transferred.>The estimated size of this message is 229526
bytes.>Click on the Retrieve From Server icon above and check mail
again to get >the whole thing. (If you're reading this in the preview
pane, you'll need >to open the message to see the icon.) If the
Retrieve From Server icon is >not showing, then this message is no
longer on the
server.________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message:
9 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:26:39 -0800
From: "BobR" <<A
href="">bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject:
Re: [MedianLine] Constant Range Bars and PFAttached are two NQH3
charts that might be of interest to some. The RangeTimeTickPF
is a visual comparison of constant range bars, time bars and tickbars(
unchanged ticks not used) and point and figure(0.5 X 3). In order to
get the time bars and tick bars to not be stopped out in Friday's decline
using the Danton Stop for trend comparison, the time bars had to be
increased to 25 minutes per bar and the tick bars had to be increased to 750
ticks per bar. The constant range bars used 5 points per bar.
The second chart compares a 750 tick bar with all ticks and 750 tick
bar with only changed ticks. Note how the one on the right without
unchanged ticks did not have the whipsaws of the one with all ticks.
This works to advantage on moving average crossovers by reducing the
whipsaws in congestion periods.enjoy,bobr[This
message contained
attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A
href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
