|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>David,
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
Are
you for real? Is my understanding correct in that you see the following 2
scenario's as the same, in that they
should
both provide proof of their claims:
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>1. The example you gave below where because people claim the CIA
blew up the WTC that they are obligated to provide
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2> proof; and
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>2. The scenario of someone who successfully trades and claims as
such that their success is due to a particular
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2> technique, that they are also obligated to
provide proof of their claims.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
I hope
I'm wrong David...I don't think I could imagine two examples that were
different on almost every level. I know other
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>readers would almost certainly agree, with little need to even discuss
the reasons why.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Adrian
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----From: donali33@xxxxxxx
[mailto:donali33@xxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 9:14
PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] Re:
Fibs<FONT
size=2>Adrian,I have some friends who live in the middle east and
right after 9-11 they ALL told me that Bin Laden was not responsible for the
bombings. I asked them, if not him, then who is? Their universal response was
the CIA. They believe that the CIA did the bombings in order to be able to
blame Bin Laden so the U.S. would have a reason to go attack him and start a
war. They honestly believe that. I told them that I and all Americans
would be very interested in seeing PROOF that the CIA was responsible. I have
yet to see any from any of them. Do you think my request for proof was
unreasonable?In my post I said: I have yet to see
one using fibs either, I am not saying it doesn't exist, but I'd sure
like to just to put this "Fib" subject to rest.If anybody responds in
defense of Fibs as a truly valid trading system please also include the
following as PROOF: Documented, real-time profits using
PRECISE NON-SUBJECTIVE RULES which can be authenticated.I
personally don't see why asking for proof in regard to Fibs is an unreasonable
request either. How about this? Forget the brokerage statements and
just tell us of any successful system or method that uses Fibs exclusively for
it's signals that we can verify. Is that honestly too much to
ask?-David CarringtonTo
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|