[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RT] SPX index forecast



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




<FONT color=#0000ff 
size=2>Joe,
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  
  <FONT 
  face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Joe Duffy 
  [mailto:joeduffy@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, 26 May 2002 7:58 
  PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] SPX 
  index forecast
  Jack Frost learned directly from Hamilton Bolton who learned directly 
  from Elliot. The book is the rules of Elliot that Ralpl Nelson 
  Elliot laid out. Many though, have changed somewhat over time. One 
  example is the the C wave count and they most certainly can be and are 
  often 3's. So the words "end of story" really don't hold much weight 
  against my hands on experience. Another example would be the contention that 
  "running a-b-c's" are very rare as Frost contends. In fact during the impuulse 
  waves of the 90's running a-b-c second waves were very common. <SPAN 
  class=608372310-27052002> 
   
  Many rules 
  haven't in fact changed as you have stated, simply refined and expanded 
  upon.  There are in fact few rules at all in the original work.  
  
  As I outlined 
  below, when you have the standard 'abc' pattern (Flat or Zig-Zag) wave 'C''s 
  are ALWAYS 5 wave structures..no exceptions..AND THAT IS HANDS ON EXPERIENCE 
  OF 15 YEARS OF DAILY APPLICATION.
   
  Running 'abc' 
  patterns ARE RARE.  Just as massive bubbles that often consist of running 
  'abc' patterns are rare. The run in the NASDAQ of the 90's WONT be repeated 
  for decades to come.
  <FONT 
  color=#0000ff size=2> 
  As far as Glenn Neely he is generally considered an excellent analyst and 
  its a view I share. His Neo-Wave though is not exactly Elliot Wave, and 
  certainly immensely more difficult. <FONT 
  color=#0000ff size=2> 
   
  Yes I 
  agree...an excellent analyst...not sure about trading.  Bad trading 
  though has nothing to do with the validity or otherwise of his method. 
   And yes it is complicated, but ONLY if 
  you follow it precisely and use Chapter 3.  I do not 
  do 
  that.
   
  While Elliot is certainly an art, one must not be constrained by what is 
  written in a book somewhere and try to fit the book to real time trading. 
  One's own observations and the ability to believe what you see are crucial. So 
  is the imagination requires to follow the princilple without being bogged down 
  by absolutes which can be counter productive.  <SPAN 
  class=608372310-27052002> 
   
  Defintely still 
  an art, but much less so with Neelys work.  And yes you must be realistic 
  and not a theoretical perfectionist or you will quickly go broke and be wrong 
  a lot. 
   
  <FONT color=#0000ff 
  size=2>Adrian 
    
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    Adrian 
    Pitt 
    To: <A 
    title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    
    Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 12:54 
    AM
    Subject: RE: [RT] SPX index 
    forecast
    
    Frost's work 
    may be the bible, but its certainly not something you would use to make 
    market analysis off.  That's like leaving school after 6th grade and 
    expecting to be a university professor. Clearly ridiculous.  There is 
    only one work I regard as the bible, and that speaking from almost 15 years 
    of real time use.  I'm speaking of Neely's book "Mastering Elliott Wave 
    Theory".  I warn readers though it is only for the very serious Elliott 
    student, and actually not something I would recommend generally.  
    
    As for C's 
    being zig-zags, that's only true if the C wave was part of a "B' or "X' wave 
    triangle, or part of a Terminating Triangle.  There are NO 3 wave C's 
    in a non-terminating impulse pattern...end of story.  To suggest 
    zig-zag C waves are common is absurd.  How would anyone gain any 
    benefit from EWT is they never knew whether the C wave was going to be a 3 
    or 5 wave affair????  Clearly the theory would be useless.  
    Thankfully, readers, you can be rest assured Frost and Elliott were 
    generally right.  ALL (except for those highlighted above) 'C' waves in 
    'abc'  are 5 wave affairs.
    <FONT color=#0000ff 
    size=2> 
    <FONT color=#0000ff 
    size=2>Regards,
    <FONT color=#0000ff 
    size=2> 
    Adrian 
    Pitt
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      
      <FONT 
      face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Joe Duffy 
      [mailto:joeduffy@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, 24 May 2002 10:49 
      AMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [RT] 
      SPX index forecast
      When Jack Frost wrote analysis part what is now kind of the bible of 
      Elliot (Prechter wrote the postcsript part), he wrote as Elliot did that 
      all c's are 5's. Having kept hourly dow charts by hand for about 8 years 
      (a while ago) I can say in my experience all C's are not 5's, and a 
      zig-zag C is common. 
       
      ---- Original Message ----- 
      <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
      style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
        <DIV 
        style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
        Don 
        Ewers 
        To: <A 
        title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        
        Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:22 
        PM
        Subject: Re: [RT] SPX index 
        forecast
        
        Lee, 
        Wave C if and when it unfolds after a wave 
        c:B advance should not be a zig-zag but a five wave decline 
        FWIW.
        don ewers
        <BLOCKQUOTE 
        style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          <DIV 
          style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
          Lee 
          Morris 
          To: <A 
          title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
          href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
          
          Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:45 
          PM
          Subject: RE: [RT] SPX index 
          forecast
          
          <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
          size=2>I think you are right on with both the short and long. The only 
          difference I have is that on the long range forecast I favor the 
          possibility of the move from sept to jan as wave A (of B), since jan 
          as wave B (which is close to ending) and the next major rally wave C 
          of B then the final down move to at or below sept would be wave C of a 
          zig zag. Practically it does not change how I would trade regardless 
          of if you are right and this is a baby bull or the second option that 
          this is a bear mkt rally. Either way the at a min the upcoming rally 
          should be very powerful. The only issue I have is with the VIX and P/C 
          ratio, at the current levels I do not think that we have the fuel for 
          this kind of rally so I would like to see the final move to your 
          target of 1030 be fast and furious to scare some 
          people.
          
            <FONT face=Tahoma 
            size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Hill, Ernie 
            [mailto:ernie.hill@xxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Thursday, May 23, 
            2002 6:55 PMTo: 
            realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [RT] SPX index 
            forecast
            
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">I 
            am pretty new to this list and this is my first attempt at a 
            contribution. I know that some of you are professionals and I 
            welcome your comments and insights to my 
            analysis.
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt"> 
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">It 
            appears that the high turning point in the SPX that some of you were 
            anticipating has been made. On 5-17 we closed at 1106.59 and then 
            again touched that level on an intra-day basis the next day. I 
            believe there is a reasonable possibility that the market could move 
            back up near the turn high over the next couple of days before 
            resuming the move down. I believe there is an even smaller chance 
            that the market may even slightly exceed the high and actually make 
            the turn as late as 5-28.
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt"> 
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=3><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-ansi-font-size: 12.0pt">My 
            short term forecast<SPAN 
            class=EmailStyle19><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">:
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt"> 
            <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: windowtext; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">I 
            am anticipating the next low turn to occur within four days of 6-4. 
            My target price range is 1027 to 1034. 1.382 times the move from 5-7 
            to 5-17 yields 79.51 points subtract this number from the high of 
            1106.59 and we arrive at the low target of 1027.08. A 61.8% 
            retracement of the move from 9-21 to 1-9 yields a target price of 
            1033.46. If this projected down move does terminate in the projected 
            target range, it has the potential to be the end point of the 
            correction for the entire move from 9-21 to 1-9. <SPAN 
            class=GramE>And could set the stage for a significant and 
            sustainable move up<SPAN 
            style="COLOR: blue">.<SPAN 
            class=EmailStyle19><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">My longer 
            term forecast:<FONT face=Arial color=black 
            size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Normally 
            my technical focus is on a much shorter time frame, but when I saw 
            that we might be about to complete the correction of the move from 
            9-21 to 1-9, I thought I would take a little longer term 
            perspective.
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">On the 
            attached and or pictured chart (I will attempt to do both) I have 
            drawn a trend line from the bottom of the first move down from the 
            March 2000 high connecting lows made in March of 2001 and September 
            of 2001. I have also drawn a trend line from the top of the first 
            upward reaction to the initial down move from the March 2000 high 
            and connected it to the high made in May of 
            2001.
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">As you can 
            see these trend lines clearly define the trading channel of the bear 
            market. Looking at this chart the first indication we have that the 
            bear market is over, is the penetration of the top trend line and 
            the fact that the market has traded outside the bear market channel 
            for most of this year.
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">My current 
            time frame for the next low turning point is within four days of 
            6-4. <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">This time 
            frame will be reached on this chart in <FONT 
            face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">the next one to two 
            bars. Notice where my target price range (1034-1027) for the next 
            low turning point falls on this chart. If during the time frame of 
            the next one to two bars my projected price range <SPAN 
            class=GramE>is met it will fall just above the upper trend 
            line at 1025. 
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">From an 
            Elliott wave standpoint the move from 9-21 to 1-9 could be 
            interpreted as a wave one impulse wave, followed by a simple A-B-C 
            zig zag correction as <FONT face=Arial color=black 
            size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">labeled on 
            the chart. <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">With 
            the <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">"C" wave 
            terminating at my projected <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">low 
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">turning 
            point, completing wave two, and setting the stage for the usually 
            dynamic impulse wave three to begin.
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">In 
            conclusion what I see in the chart patterns and in my 
            analysis <FONT face=Arial 
            color=black size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">is the 
            early stages<FONT face=Arial color=black 
            size=2><SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> of a 
            new B<SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">ull 
            market, and an excellent buying opportunity dead 
            ahead.
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">E
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><IMG id=_x0000_i1025 height=600 alt=DGLChart 
            width=800>
            <SPAN 
            style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> <FONT 
            size=3>******************************************************************This 
            email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso 
            Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use 
            of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you 
            have received this email in error please notify the 
            sender.******************************************************************To 
            unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
            to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
            use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
            href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of 
            Service. To unsubscribe from 
          this group, send an email 
          to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
          use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
          href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of 
          Service. 
          
        <BLOCKQUOTE 
        style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT 
          face=Arial size=2>---Outgoing mail is certified Virus 
          Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (<A 
          href="http://www.grisoft.com";>http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 
          6.0.362 / Virus Database: 199 - Release Date: 
      5/7/02To unsubscribe from this 
      group, send an email 
      to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
      use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
      href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
    To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Attachment: Description: ""