[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Pedantry for you and...



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Ric,
 
pls try to resist the urge and stop that 
overflow.
It'll be very much appreciated.
 
Regards,
Jan Philipp
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  ric 
  ingram 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:02 
  PM
  Subject: [RT] Pedantry for you 
  and...
  Hi "sunsetisles2001",On Date: Wed, 06 Feb 
  2002 16:55:08 -0000  you wrote:From: "sunsetisles2001" <<A 
  href="mailto:sunsetisles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>sunsetisles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  Subject: Re: Confidence is (nearly) allPlease change your web site 
  to: <FONT 
  color=#0000ff 
  size=3>http://www.pedantryrus.com/Thank 
  you for your amusing and inventive comment.Someone could grab that bit 
  of cyber-space territory.I would like to meet your expectations of 
  me.So to be pedantic, "sunsetisles2001", your isles seen to have the 
  sun set on them last year.One of the assumptions you appear to be 
  making is that because you do not value my email that all others feel the 
  same.If I have helped one person, my efforts are 
  worthwhile.    What are you giving back to the trading 
  community?You also appear to assume that I believe I can reach 
  everyone.    I cannot reach everyone, or more accurately I 
  believe I cannot reach everyone.    See how I do try to meet 
  your expectations of pedantry.Nor can you reach everyone with any 
  posting you make.None of us can.As usual, it seems most of the 
  positive responses are sent privately, and almost all the negative reactions 
  are sent publicly.Does this give you a hint as to a possible purpose 
  of those that publish wholly negative emotional reactions in the 
  forum?If my message had no merit for you, and no relevance for you, it 
  would be ignored - and correctly so.   The delete key that others 
  have wisely spoken of.If the message had value for you, you would 
  digest and optionally write privately.If there was an area of 
  confusion or disagreement etcetera, you would ask privately or in public, 
  specifying your query or disagreement or suggestion or correction.If 
  the message hit a sore spot and caused emotional pain, to some degree, however 
  small or large, then you might hit back emotionally, in public, to the 
  forum.So unfortunately for your apparent denial of your denial, the 
  whole group now knows which of the above categories you appear to fall 
  within.Hope this is a wake-up call for you.I have no illusions 
  of being able to help more than a subset of the forums 
  members.    As I said in my original email, twenty years ago if 
  someone gave me the ideas about confidence, it would have been wasted on 
  me.   Perhaps even ten years ago I would have reacted emotionally to 
  the confidence ideas and been in denial of the source of the 
  reaction.As always we have to give permission to be upset.   
  While some see no purpose, some find use in the message for their current 
  situation, some see it as obvious and assume others do too.    
  Some will take it personally and others will be upset in a non-specific 
  manner.    All these responses/reactions are more a 
  function of the reader and his/her developmental stage than what is actually 
  written or indeed how it is written.Reactions are as much or more 
  about us - as they are about that which we react to.From my personal 
  experience and those of my coaching clients, to trade successfully, most, if 
  not all traders seem to need to understand this truth of human behaviour and 
  get past it.   Otherwise we will always be victims of our reactions 
  to external events.Successful traders are exploiters of external 
  events, not victims.May you be an exploiter not a 
  victim.Paradoxically, exploiters seem to be mostly providers of 
  service and victims are most often seekers of service in the 
  market.Now you know one of the purposes of my emails - to open up 
  perceptions to help spur you on your own individual path to trading 
  success.     And every path is different, and yet has many 
  common features. I am truly sorry that your perceptions seem to be 
  mostly closed at this time.    This is obviously right for you 
  at this time and I respect this.  They will open when you are 
  ready.Accept that others are at different stages of their perceptions 
  being opened and at different stages on their different paths.Your 
  perceptions and stage is not others perceptions and 
  stage.Unconditional regards, Ric.<A 
  href="http://www.traderscalm.com/"; eudora="autourl">www.traderscalm.com 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.