|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello
these are OLD systems
the NEW ones made by Kyosera is MUCH more
efficient
and then deduct the 55% rebates
Ben
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
Clyde Lee
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:15
PM
Subject: Re: [RT] should we be contrarian
to this report ??
Think things are not
what Ben thinks !
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#1";>System 1: Rated
output of 480 watts in full sun. List $8,950. - <FONT
face="Times New Roman,Times">SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$7,690.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#2";>System 2: Rated
output of 960 watts in full sun. List $12,650. - <FONT
face="Times New Roman,Times" color=#ff0000>SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$10,990.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#3";>System 3: Rated
output of 1440 wattsin full sun . List $16,300.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE $14,375<FONT
color=#ff0000>.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#4";>System 4: Rated
output of 1920 watts in full sun. List $19,900.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$17,630.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#5";>System 5: Rated
output of 2400 watts in full sun. List $23,500. - <FONT
face="Times New Roman,Times">SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$20,900.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#6";>System 6: Rated
output of 2800 watts in full sun. List $27,600.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$24,585.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#7";>System 7: Rated
output of 3360 watts in full sun. List $31,200.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$27,875.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#8";>System 8: Rated
output of 3840 watts in full sun. List $34,800.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$30,190.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#9";>System 9: Rated
output of 4320 watts in full sun. List $37,400.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE <FONT
color=#000000>$33,505.*
<A
href="http://www.bigfrogmountain.com/packages.cfm#10";>System 10: Rated
output of 4800 watts in full sun. List $40,690.<FONT
color=#ff0000> - <FONT
color=#ff0000>SALE $35,770.*
*Shipping included in the continental
USA. Battery banks must be sized and sold separately for stand alone
systems. Don't forget, multiply the system's rated output by the number of
'full-sun hours per day' for your area, to see how many watt-hours any system
will average yielding per day.
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
<A title=bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>BobR
To: <A
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:33
PM
Subject: Re: [RT] should we be
contrarian to this report ??
From star light? That can't possibly be much more
power than to illuminatea night light. Ben, it sounds like a
scam. Have you seen this system? Areyou buying
one?bobr----- Original Message -----From: "profitok"
<<A
href="mailto:profitok@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>profitok@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent:
Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:40 AMSubject: Re: [RT] should we be
contrarian to this report ??> Hello> Maybe many of you
do not know> it cost $7500 to install a solar
system that produce enoughelectricity> for the whole
house,,(it does it even at night from the star light,,> you get 40%
rebate from the fed GOV,, and 15% from your state> this REALLY will
take the bite out of this oil prices> Ben> -----
Original Message -----> From: "BobR"
<bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> To:
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25,
2001 12:28 PM> Subject: Re: [RT] should we be contrarian to this
report ??>>> > Nah, I like the idea of cutting the
demand for oil through conservation> and> > efficiency of
design. A $1 drop in price per barrel saves $7,billion.>
That> > is a powerful weapon. It took a $4 drop to get the
Saudi's to join the> > aniti OBL/Taliban coalition.
The dollar still rules.> >> >> > -----
Original Message -----> > From: "Norman Winski"
<nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > To:
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Sent: Tuesday, September
25, 2001 7:36 AM> > Subject: Re: [RT] should we be contrarian to
this report ??> >> >> > > Ok people, let's
get out there and spend spend spend! If we consume> >
enough,> > > we can beat bin Ladin and those terrorists. Do
your patriotic part and> > > spend, spend, spend! Now get
those credit cards out and> > > Chaaaarrrrrrrrge!!!!>
> >> > > Conspicoius Consumingly,> >
>> > > Norman> > > ----- Original Message
-----> > > From: <SLAWEKP@xxxxxxx>> > > To:
<REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Sent: Tuesday,
September 25, 2001 8:30 AM> > > Subject: [RT] should we be
contrarian to this report ??> > >> > >>
> > > 09/25 00:01> > > > Bloomberg Consumer
Confidence Index Rose After Sept. 11 Attacks> > > > By
Brendan Murray> > > >> > > >> >
> > Washington, Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Consumer confidence in
theeconomy> > > rose> > > > this month to
the highest level since January, according to a> Bloomberg>
> > News> > > > poll taken after the worst terrorist
violence in U.S. history.> > > >> > > >
Bloomberg's confidence index, derived from a series of
questionsabout> > the> > > > economy, rose to
86.68 this month from 83.8 in a June survey, asurvey> >
of> > > > 1,200 adults found. The increase was the second in
a row. The last> time> > > the> > > >
index was higher was when it was 89.3 in January.> > >
>> > > > ``The American people are angry, grieving and
upset, but theyhaven't> > lost> > > > faith in
the economy,'' said Evans Witt, president of PrincetonSurvey>
> > > Research Associates, which conducted the poll last
week.> > > >> > > > Americans expect stocks
will rise and a majority predicted their> > personal> >
> > finances will stay the same or improve in the next year, the
survey> > found.> > > A> > > > jump
in President George W. Bush's approval rating to 83 percentfrom>
55> > > > percent last month shows that Americans favor his
handling of the> > crisis.> > > >> >
> > Still, 70 percent think there will be more terrorist assaults
withina> > > year,> > > > and a third think
those that occurred Sept. 11 will very likely do> >
serious> > > > harm to the economy.> > >
>> > > > Half of the respondents said it's a good time to
buy stocks,according> > to> > > the> >
> > survey, taken the same week the Dow Jones Industrial
Averagesuffered> > its> > > > steepest decline
in almost 70 years. Forty-five percent had giventhat> > >
> response in June, and 40 percent in April.> > >
>> > > > With eight cuts in interest rates by Federal
Reserve policy makers> this> > > year,> > >
> almost two-thirds of the respondents said it's a good time to buy
a> > house.> > > >> > > > `Still
Confident'> > > >> > > > ``I'm spending just
as much as I did two weeks ago,'' said Lila> > >
Stangeland,> > > > 34, mother of two in South Brunswick, New
Jersey. She and herhusband,> > > Glen> > >
> Marchese, 35, recently bought a house, and they plan to spend
about> > > $12,000> > > > to $15,000 on
furnishings and landscaping during the next fewmonths.> >
``So> > > > far we are still confident that we'll get a
paycheck and spend likewe> > > do.''> > >
>> > > > Stangeland gave another reason for carrying on
after the attacks.> > > ``Stopping> > > > our
lives is just going to hurt the economy,'' she said.> > >
>> > > > The poll, which was taken in telephone
interviews from Sept. 18 to> Sept.> > > 23,> >
> > has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Thesurvey> > is> > > > taken every six weeks,
and the confidence index is computedquarterly.> > >
>> > > > Residents of New York were excluded from this
survey, since peoplein> > > > disaster areas typically
don't respond. The survey was intended to> take> >
a> > > > national rather than regional approach.>
> > >> > > > The attacks two weeks ago, which left
more than 6,000 men, women and> > > children> > >
> missing and presumed dead, have raised concern among economists
that> the> > > U.S.> > > > economy,
already weakening, would slide into its first recession ina> >
> decade.> > > >> > > > `You Can't
Panic'> > > >> > > > Even so, consumers have
become more optimistic about theirportfolios.> > > >
Fifty-five percent of those polled said they expect the Dow will be>
> higher> > > a> > > > year from now, up
from 35 percent in the June survey, according tothe> > >
poll.> > > >> > > > ``It's frightening when
you see your net worth drop,'' said Sara> Baxter,> > >
37,> > > > shopping Friday at a Target Corp. store in Colma,
California. Still,> > ``You> > > > can't
panic.''> > > >> > > > She and her husband
run a business doing pre-employment background> > checks>
> > > ``which is going to be even hotter now.''> > >
>> > > > Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan told Congress last
week that ``economic> > > activity> > > >
ground to a halt'' in the week after hijackers crashed planes
intothe> > > World> > > > Trade Center
towers in New York and the Pentagon near Washington. He> >
said> > > the> > > > outlook remains strong for
growth in the longer term.> > > >> > > > The
poll showed the attacks widened the gulf between those who said>
the> > > > economy is set to improve and those who said it
will worsen.> > Thirty-eight> > > > percent expect
the economy will get better in the next 12 months,> >
compared> > > > with 35 percent in an August survey.
Thirty-two percent of the> > respondents> > > >
expect the economy will deteriorate in the next year, up from 20>
percent> > > in> > > > August, the poll
found.> > > >> > > > Personal
Finances> > > >> > > > When asked about the
outlook for their own personal finances, 88> percent> >
> of> > > > the respondents expect no change or an
improvement during the next> year,> > > down>
> > > from 93 percent in the June survey, the poll found.>
> > >> > > > While three-quarters of the
respondents said they haven't boughtextra> > > >
groceries or household supplies since the attacks, only 10 percent>
said> > > they> > > > canceled travel plans and
5 percent said they delayed a major> purchase,> > >
the> > > > poll found. Almost two-thirds said they've given
money to charity.> > > >> > > > The poll
reflected the impact on U.S. airlines. Forty-three percent>
said> > > they> > > > are more afraid to fly in
an airplane, while 50 percent reported no> > > > difference
in their confidence in air travel, the poll showed. Only> 19%>
> > said> > > > they feel very safe flying in a
commercial jetliner.> > > >> > > > No Change
in Plans> > > >> > > > Baxter, shopping in
California, said she and her husband aretraveling> > >
next> > > > week to Montana by plane. ``Sure I'd be nervous,
but I don't thinkI'd> > > change> > > > my
plans,'' she said.> > > >> > > > Consumers
may be containing their level of pessimism until they see>
how> > > the> > > > U.S. responds to the
attacks or whether terrorist groups strikeagain,> > >
Witt> > > > said.> > > >> > >
> Eighty-nine percent of U.S. adults say they like the way Bush
is> > > responding> > > > to the assaults, and
78 percent support military attacks againstthose> > > >
responsible.> > > >> > > > Fifty-five
percent said the Social Security surplus shouldn't bespent> >
on> > > the> > > > war effort, and 35 percent
said it should.> > > >> > > > The survey
results showed men and women differed in their degree of> > >
> confidence in the country's future. Thirty-eight percent of
women> expect> > > the> > > > economy
will worsen in the next year, compared with 26 percent ofmen.>
> > Almost> > > > half of men -- 46 percent -- expect
economic growth will accelerate,> > > compared> >
> > with 30 percent of women, the poll found.> > >
>> > > >> > > >> > > > To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> > > >
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to> > <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >> > > >> > >> >
>> > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group,
send an email to:> > >
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >
>> > >> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to> <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> >> > >> >> >> >>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:> >
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >>
>> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to<A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this
group, send an email to:>
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>>To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
<font face=arial
size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|