|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
There
are 2 points I wish to bring up not related directly to this
discussion.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
1] An
excellent book on testing hypotheses statistically without complex maths well
adapted to psychology & markets , cause/effect [ it does not test
systems for profitability,drawdowns etc..] Experimental
Methodology by Larry . B . Christensen 8th ed , I have the 2nd ed from way
back.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
2] A
question for Norman I brought up on another group : I claimed that there was a
correlation between increased message activity in groups as well as irritability
and conflict and impending large market moves . Any current basis for that in
Astrological configurations ? eg GG and Bonnie and arguments in
RT.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Serge
<FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: wavemechanic
[mailto:wd78@xxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: June 03, 2001 0:09 AMTo:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: Re[6]: [RT] HOW
UNFORTUNATE
Ztrader:
I guess I missed something. You ask for any
non-moon astrological correlation to be presented. Does this mean that you
have seen what you consider to be valid moon correlation? If so, which
data?
Bill
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
ztrader
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:43
PM
Subject: Re[6]: [RT] HOW
UNFORTUNATE
On Saturday, June 02, 2001, 1:55:30 PM, Norman Winski
wrote:NW> Given the fact that you claim to be so expert
at scientificNW> statistical analysis, why haven't you performed your
desiredNW> analysis?Given the lack of a 'scientific' basis, I
don't 'believe' in thetechniques. Why should I spend time looking at
things I don't'believe' in?NW> Why do you always depend on
other to do the analysisNW> that you say you would like to
see?First, I NEVER depend on others to do my analyses. Your 'always'
hasno basis in fact and is an example of a snide remark that
deservescorrection by you.NW> Why not do your own analysis and
share it with us?True believer A claims to have a great
technique.Scientist B asks for scientific proof of A's claim.It is NOT
up to scientist B to validate A's claim - that is A'sresponsibility.If
you make a claim, you provide the analysis.NW> Take one of the many
hypothesis that has been presented, that youNW> have challenged on this
list, and post the analysis you so longNW> desire.If person A
makes a claim, person A should provide the analysis.NW> I eagerly
await to be shown the digital light.So do I. After watching this
astro/science discussion come up, in somany groups, for so many years, and
with not *one* stat confirmation,I must conclude that it is not possible
to show ANY non-moon astrocorrelation with the market that is
statistically valid. I am waitingto be proven wrong on this,
though.Given the lack of stat evidence that it does exist, why should
I tryto prove it to those that make such claims? That is totally
backwards.If you make a claim, you provide the
analysis.ztraderTo unsubscribe from this
group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|