[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[6]: [RT] HOW UNFORTUNATE



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Ztrader:
 
I guess I missed something.  You ask for any 
non-moon astrological correlation to be presented.  Does this mean that you 
have seen what you consider to be valid moon correlation?  If so, which 
data?
 
Bill
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  ztrader 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:43 
  PM
  Subject: Re[6]: [RT] HOW 
UNFORTUNATE
  On Saturday, June 02, 2001, 1:55:30 PM, Norman Winski 
  wrote:NW>   Given the fact that you claim to be so expert 
  at scientificNW> statistical analysis, why haven't you performed your 
  desiredNW> analysis?Given the lack of a 'scientific' basis, I 
  don't 'believe' in thetechniques. Why should I spend time looking at 
  things I don't'believe' in?NW> Why do you always depend on 
  other to do the analysisNW> that you say you would like to 
  see?First, I NEVER depend on others to do my analyses. Your 'always' 
  hasno basis in fact and is an example of a snide remark that 
  deservescorrection by you.NW> Why not do your own analysis and 
  share it with us?True believer A claims to have a great 
  technique.Scientist B asks for scientific proof of A's claim.It is NOT 
  up to scientist B to validate A's claim - that is A'sresponsibility.If 
  you make a claim, you provide the analysis.NW> Take one of the many 
  hypothesis that has been presented, that youNW> have challenged on this 
  list, and post the analysis you so longNW> desire.If person A 
  makes a claim, person A should provide the analysis.NW> I eagerly 
  await to be shown the digital light.So do I. After watching this 
  astro/science discussion come up, in somany groups, for so many years, and 
  with not *one* stat confirmation,I must conclude that it is not possible 
  to show ANY non-moon astrocorrelation with the market that is 
  statistically valid. I am waitingto be proven wrong on this, 
  though.Given the lack of stat evidence that it does exist, why should 
  I tryto prove it to those that make such claims? That is totally 
  backwards.If you make a claim, you provide the 
  analysis.ztraderTo 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor












To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.