|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes! Questions, challenges with reason, requests for proofs, but not
derision, ridicule and plane nastiness. Those are the tools of the ignorant
and those with closed minds. Yes any set of random numbers will work, but
not the same numbers, consistently over an extended period of time. So will
a dart aimed at the stock sheet of the newspaper, or any other method you can
come up with. If there is a constant correlation, then it is worth looking
into. I am neither arguing for or against Delta, I am only stating that
there appears to be a reasonable basis for further checking and study and
that the new tools in Ensign allow that to be done. I have no affiliation
with Ensign other then I have been a user since 1989.
DH wrote:
> > Newton discovered gravity because an apple fell. I am
> > glad that he wasn't on this list or a lot great physics formulas would
> > have never been made public.
>
> The challenges to ideas which occur on this list are really quite mild
> compared to the peer reviews which occur in the scientific community.
> Ask any grad student in physics, mathematics or economics. Peer review
> is an essential part of the process of testing a new theory. If the
> theory can stand up the the objections and independent testing of people
> with knowledge of the subject matter, it is probably a good one. If it
> can't, it's back to the drawing board.
>
> --
> Dennis
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|