|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Amen
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From:
ztrader
To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 12:31
PM
Subject: Re: [RT] correlation vs
causation
On Tuesday, May 22, 2001, 6:14:06 AM, Ketayun
wrote:K> I do find that astro-marketologists often confuse
correlation withK> causation.Agreed.K> I don't see
why it matters which came first, the value of learning thisK> or any
science is the ability to use the known to prepare for theK>
unknown.True, but first I'd like to see some statistically
significantcorrelation. This has been asked for *many* times for
*specific*'predictions' mentioned on this list, but is still lacking. All
weever get is a reference to some old work on a topic that has
nothingto do with the specific 'prediction' in an RT post. The only
goodastro/stat work has been done by a non-astro person, and for the
moononly.Once we have a significant correlation, I don't care if
it's caused bygreen extraterrestrials with 13 eyes [has to be a fibo,
right?], I'lluse it too. :-)ztraderTo
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|