[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Me too. I'll take a little substantive "in your face" over those that
consistently slither over, under and around the rules they choose to ignore.

Regards,

Tom Alexander


----- Original Messa

ge -----
From: Bobh <bheisler@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules


> Add my vote to inviting MB back on the List.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
>
>
> > I strongly agree with this.  This is not a mailing list with children on
> it.
> > There are some people who never 'cuss and who post worthless crap and
some
> > people who post great info and great carried away a little in the heat
of
> a
> > debate.  I'd rather have substance than pomp and circumstance.
> >
> > Kent
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <I4Lothian@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:49 PM
> > Subject: [RT] Mark Brown & RT Rules
> >
> >
> > I would like to argue that the policy of banishment for certain type of
> > policy violations is a bit extreme.  Yes, we all value civil
discussions.
> > But I can tell you from working in this industry that civility sometimes
> > goes
> > out the window during some of the most interesting and heated
discussions.
> >
> > Passion can lead to incredible creativity and original thought, as well
as
> > ugly moments and unfortunate choices of words.  Sometimes we just need
to
> > cool down and I would suggest that a 1 week or 2 week cool down period
for
> > violations of the language or conduct violations would be a much fairer
> > punishment.
> >
> > Kicking Mark Brown off of real-traders for language violations or even
for
> > being a pain in the ASS (emphasis added for effect) on occasion is a
> > shortsighted policy for someone who has contributed as much original
> thought
> > and thought provoking posts as he has.
> >
> > Sure, there are some that do not like him.  There are those who don't
like
> > me
> > either.  Big Deal.  I am not here to be liked, or liked by all, but
rather
> > to
> > learn and to share.
> >
> > Personally, I like seeing people's ideas challenged.  When people
> challenge
> > my ideas, that only makes me and the ideas stronger.  Mark challenges
> > people.
> >
> > I challenge the moderator(s) or list owners of this list to change their
> > rules and allow greater freedom of expression and to establish cooling
> down
> > periods rather than banishment.    Lighten up a little, or you will end
up
> > making this a less interesting and useful forum for sharing information
> and
> > ideas.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John J. Lothian
> >
> > Disclosure: Futures trading involves financial risk, lots of it!
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/