|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Research Dept." <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Norman Winski" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [RT] Band Study (better explained)
> Hello Norman,
>
> NW> NW: Did you also test for this markets whose options or futures don't
expire
> big irrelevant bunch of bull snipped here.
> NW> Mystically, Norman
>
> actually unlike you astro guys i posted something that was high eighty
> percent winners - if you care to make my indicators into a system. how
> many of you astro guys have posted proof like that in hard numbers?
> not one lets see some statistical proof i have been providing it norm.
> no you guys see what you want to belive in not what is fact. it seems
> you guys are all threatened by facts and hard numbers. go back and
> read the astro post, maybe, might have, would have, could have,
> possibly, sounds like a professional market expert on cnbc.
>
> i dont post after the fact i post during the fact and before the fact.
> now when you get some squiggly lines all perfect showing what would
> have been be sure to post them so we can be awed at how well the lines
> have been fit.
>
> and dont try and relate anything i do to what you do to gain
> credibility we are light years away from alignment.
RD,
Great!!. Issac Newton said that the proof of any science is its ability to
predict. On the evening of May 8, and many other previous times on this
list, I forecasted what would would happen in the future. In that particular
case, I correctly forecasted the overall trend for May 9 and several
intra-day turning points within a small amount of time and price. I think
the long time members of this list will have to admit that these precise
forecasts have been about 80% accurate for forecasting turning points..
Oh great Research Department, I bow to your statical wizardry. You are a
genius at analyzing what has already happened. However, I don't remember you
ever posting what would happen in the future. Now it's your turn. Either
post a clear and simple forecast for a market (other than it will fluctuate)
of which we can later determine its accuracy, or forever hang up your
sarcasm and start taking your charm pills. You put yourself out as a great
scientific student of the markets. So far, my simple "eyeball science" is
running rings around your digital didactics. Now the time has come for you
to prove your stuff other than resting on the principle that statistical
hindsight is genius.
Predict or Perish!
Eyeballingly,
Norman
>
>
> Best regards,
> Research mailto:research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|