[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[3]: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello Mark,

You are wasting your time with this conversation with Norman. He wants to
believe what he wants. If you wear colored glasses then the world will
look a certain way. Well, Norman has his glasses on...and no one...and
I mean NO ONE can tell him other than what he sees.

If his interpatations works for him...then all the power. Spend your
time in coversations with others on this list who are so stuck on
themselves and their point of view.

you wrote:

> Hello Norman,

NW>> NW: Wrong!  There are computer programs available that can test for
NW>> correlations between planetary events and market movements and give you the
NW>> results in a few minutes.

> correct  you  are  - however i respectfully ask that you keep the open
> mind  to  understand that the results are static.  anyone can test and
> optimize  a static body of work and pick that results which proves the
> point  that  your  eyes wish to see.  a dynamic body (planetary) has a
> expansion  factor  that  is  not  known  as  an  absolute.   thus  any
> predictions  based  upon  it  are  frivolous  other than to prove the
> history has been fitted to the end means.

NW>>        The only thing you have proven is your lack of knowledge in this
NW>> area.

> i  know as much as i need to know..  at least about your chosen topic.
>  what may i ask do you know about my preferred trading method?  i have
> at  least  performed  to  my  satisfaction  -  exhaustive research in a
> dismal, dreadful and less than enlightening planetary theory of old.

NW>> Cheers,
NW>> Norman

> ps i appreciate you not making personal comments towards my opinion.


-- 
Namaste',
Mark



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/