[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[3]: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

MS,

  Who is wasting whose time?  I don't remember you posting any proof or
disproof or any accurate market forecasts?  The proof of any science is its
ability to predict.

  Looks like MB has a like minded buddy. Ain't that nice?

Cheers,

Norman
in the sky with glasses


----- Original Message -----
From: "MS" <mjs720@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:10 AM
Subject: Re[3]: [RT] Re: Validity of orbital element


> Hello Mark,
>
> You are wasting your time with this conversation with Norman. He wants to
> believe what he wants. If you wear colored glasses then the world will
> look a certain way. Well, Norman has his glasses on...and no one...and
> I mean NO ONE can tell him other than what he sees.
>
> If his interpatations works for him...then all the power. Spend your
> time in coversations with others on this list who are so stuck on
> themselves and their point of view.
>
> you wrote:
>
> > Hello Norman,
>
> NW>> NW: Wrong!  There are computer programs available that can test for
> NW>> correlations between planetary events and market movements and give
you the
> NW>> results in a few minutes.
>
> > correct  you  are  - however i respectfully ask that you keep the open
> > mind  to  understand that the results are static.  anyone can test and
> > optimize  a static body of work and pick that results which proves the
> > point  that  your  eyes wish to see.  a dynamic body (planetary) has a
> > expansion  factor  that  is  not  known  as  an  absolute.   thus  any
> > predictions  based  upon  it  are  frivolous  other than to prove the
> > history has been fitted to the end means.
>
> NW>>        The only thing you have proven is your lack of knowledge in
this
> NW>> area.
>
> > i  know as much as i need to know..  at least about your chosen topic.
> >  what may i ask do you know about my preferred trading method?  i have
> > at  least  performed  to  my  satisfaction  -  exhaustive research in a
> > dismal, dreadful and less than enlightening planetary theory of old.
>
> NW>> Cheers,
> NW>> Norman
>
> > ps i appreciate you not making personal comments towards my opinion.
>
>
> --
> Namaste',
> Mark
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/