|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
It would not be merely a question of land area else Alaska would be highest
in consumption. It's more a question of population density coupled with land
area, I would think.
--PJS
Me wrote:
> Regarding use of energy in CA, I was surprised to come across the
> statistic below. we don't use that much electricity per capita. But
> because CA is a big state in terms of land area, we get blamed for
> total high consumption. You've got to compare oranges with oranges...
>
> California is 48th in per-capita energy consumption. The state is
> 2nd -- behind Texas -- in total power consumed.
>
> Latest figures. Source: U.S. Department of Energy
>
> JW
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|