[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: remember Saddam



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

http://www.stratfor.com/

http://www.worldtribune.com/

http://www.softwar.net/index.html

http://www.newsmax.com/

http://www.the-times.co.uk/

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/

http://www.worldtribune.com/tout-3.html

http://www.drudgereport.com/

These sites regularly print news that the US press studiously ignores or
distorts. Think about it: the hottest story this week is gun locks! Talk
about willful ignorance!

informingly,

Michael

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rory Lewellen" <rl2946@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 20:07
Subject: [RT] Re: remember Saddam


|      Earl,
|
|   Interesting point you bring up on
|   confirmation for conflict.
|   Red China is heavily involved in
|   both Crude and Copper.
|   Coincidentally both moving up.
|   I doubt Beijing has the Navy to
|   execute a viable invasion by sea
|   any time soon.
|
|   Wonder whether the communists have
|   purchased equipment capable of
|   tunneling under the strait; a tad
|   larger scale than the chunnel.
|
|   When does the Year of the Rat begin?
|
|        Musingly,
|
|        Rory
|
|
|
| Very interesting and not so outrageous! Does anyone really expect that
| a) this administration is competent in foreign policy or b) this
| administration would tell the truth if China were preparing for war?
| OOH, there are a zillion non-government satellites up there gathering
| information so it's reasonable to expect that a major buildup along
| China's shore would not go unnoticed. Might we find confirmation in
| other markets? What commodities does China export or import heavily
| where informed buyers or sellers might stockpile commodities in
| expectation of trouble?
|
| Earl
|
|
|