|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3616.1301"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Well hello there again Norman,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>It <FONT color=#000000 face=Arial
size=2><STRONG>is </STRONG></FONT>possible to do this with neural nets. In
the short time I have been posting to RT regading these specific models, my Best
Model has produced over $30,000 in additional equity since 1-20-2000 (13 trading
days). Go nets go. As far as beating investment firms, take a look
at Biocomp's severely abbreviated list of customers at <A
href="http://www.biocompsystems.com/pages/customers.htm";>http://www.biocompsystems.com/pages/customers.htm</A>
. I think you will recognize a few investment related firms there.
They use Profit 2000 just as a multitude of individual investors do. I'm
living proof it doesn't take millions of dollars in investment to generate great
models. As an engineer and former professor of finance, I just applied
some common sense indicators to predict the S&P 500 futures prices. Nothing
difficult about that. All lot of trial and error? You better believe
it. It seems like anytime someone starts to contribute something of
interest to this group that looks like it is making money in any shape or form,
they are immediately attacked. I've seen this proven in numerous posts all
too often. Fax me your trades if you have such a great system they
say. I personally do not wish to put up with such nonsense from
hyper-sensitive criticizers. For this reason, I am resigning myself from
making further posts to this group regarding my models. Please at least try
Profit 2000 or some other decent neural net program before you attack anyone
else Norman. Neural nets do work if properly applied. I think you
will be pleasantly surprised. See you at the bank, Brian.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Feb 04 22:12:27 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA17524
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:47:17 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 21:40:57 -0800
Received: from fh101.infi.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 21:35:34 -0800
Received: from naples.infi.net (FTMYB102-19.splitrock.net [209.156.222.19])
by fh101.infi.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA08243;
Sat, 5 Feb 2000 00:38:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <389BE0F4.7AAA5EEB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 00:36:05 -0800
From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: InfiNet
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: S&P500 Followup/Followup
References: <001b01bf6f96$71208f40$a283aec7@xxxxx>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EC0FAD45B56609CB5CB82C1E"
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<P>Mindspring wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Whoops.
Make that www.mindspring.com/~blee7/
. The parentheses at the end of the web address in the previous post
messed up the appropriate link. - Brian</FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
Brian,
<BR> Commercial done yet?
<P>Uncommercially,
<P>Norman
<P>Commercial free message #149
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Feb 05 09:15:38 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA21182
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 5 Feb 2000 00:23:57 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 23:17:53 -0800
Received: from fh101.infi.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 23:12:15 -0800
Received: from naples.infi.net (FTMYB102-04.splitrock.net [209.156.222.4])
by fh101.infi.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA26558;
Sat, 5 Feb 2000 02:15:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <389BF7A1.CBAFCCB1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 02:12:51 -0800
From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: InfiNet
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Re: Commercial Done Yet?
References: <004701bf6f9e$353efea0$a283aec7@xxxxx>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------12461B3BF6AEE3983D09BDD3"
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<P>Mindspring wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Hi Norm,</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>As I have explained in several previous posts, if anyone
wishes to obtain results that mimic and/or exceed my models, they need
only to turn to companies like BioComSystems http://www.biocompsystems.com/
which provides all details on how to build profitable models. With a 60
day money back guarantee on your purchase, how can you lose? I'm sure there
are other reputable neural vendors out there besides BioComp as well. -
Best wishes, Brian</FONT><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>NW:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1> Brian,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>1. Thanks for continuing your commercial. Can someone
tell me why Brian's post is not a commercial or why</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1>his commercial is allowed? After all the controversy
we recently had on this topic, I would think Brian would be in RT jail
by now?.</FONT><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>2. Serveral major Wall Street have spent millions
of dollars trying to use neural networks and artificial intelligence wihout
much success. If it were possible to do this, it would be in the market
now. Any conventional program that can be purchased or created for under
a few million dollars has already been tried so you are not going to beat
Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs. The only way to beat these guys is to
find a system that they could never justify in a court of law under the
prudent man law. It would have to be something that is very unorthodox
that it would prohibit them from using it because they could be sued for
using it by their investors, i.e. Astrology.</FONT><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>Unprudently,</FONT><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>Norman</FONT><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<P><FONT SIZE=-1>no artificial intelligence</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1>no neurals</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1>no commerical</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1>this is commercial free message #150</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> </BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Feb 05 09:17:28 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA02430
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 5 Feb 2000 09:47:22 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 08:41:16 -0800
Received: from nashville.com by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 08:35:07 -0800
Message-ID: <001901bf6ff6$75411260$d38841cf@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Scot Billington" <scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <008a01bf6fb1$c74bee80$a283aec7@xxxxx>
Subject: [RT] Brian-Please quit posting ads.
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 10:31:26 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01BF6FC4.282A57C0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>You are missing the point. Your last few posts have been
blatant advertisements, which you know are not allowed on RT. People do
not attack winning methodologies; they attacks advertisements. Please stop
posting them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sincerely,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Scot Billington</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=blee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Mindspring</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, February 05, 2000 2:19
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [RT] If it were possible to do
this...</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Well hello there again Norman,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>It <FONT color=#000000 face=Arial
size=2><STRONG>is </STRONG></FONT>possible to do this with neural nets.
In the short time I have been posting to RT regading these specific models, my
Best Model has produced over $30,000 in additional equity since 1-20-2000 (13
trading days). Go nets go. As far as beating investment firms,
take a look at Biocomp's severely abbreviated list of customers at <A
href="http://www.biocompsystems.com/pages/customers.htm";>http://www.biocompsystems.com/pages/customers.htm</A>
. I think you will recognize a few investment related firms there.
They use Profit 2000 just as a multitude of individual investors do. I'm
living proof it doesn't take millions of dollars in investment to generate
great models. As an engineer and former professor of finance, I just
applied some common sense indicators to predict the S&P 500 futures
prices. Nothing difficult about that. All lot of trial and error? You
better believe it. It seems like anytime someone starts to contribute
something of interest to this group that looks like it is making money in any
shape or form, they are immediately attacked. I've seen this proven in
numerous posts all too often. Fax me your trades if you have such a
great system they say. I personally do not wish to put up with such
nonsense from hyper-sensitive criticizers. For this reason, I am
resigning myself from making further posts to this group regarding my models.
Please at least try Profit 2000 or some other decent neural net program before
you attack anyone else Norman. Neural nets do work if properly
applied. I think you will be pleasantly surprised. See you at the
bank, Brian.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Feb 05 13:36:22 2000
Return-Path: <listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA05941
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 5 Feb 2000 11:56:51 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 10:50:30 -0800
Received: from 192.168.1.2 by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 10:44:59 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.3] by 192.168.1.2 (AppleShare IP Mail Server 6.3) id 37872 via TCP with SMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 10:47:43 -0800
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630)
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 10:47:42 -0800
Subject: [RT] who is best electronic brokerage for trading OEX?
From: Eliot Kaplan <eliot@xxxxxxx>
To: "<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Omega Digest List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <B4C1B04E.26B7%eliot@xxxxxxx>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: eliot@xxxxxxx
Sender: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: listmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: eliot@xxxxxxx
Status:
Anyone have any experienced opinion about who is the best electronic
brokerage for trading OEX options?
Prime criteria are:
1. fast, accurate fills with direct to pit execution (does it exist for
OEX?)
2. reliable & stable independent software (i.e. not browser based, as this
implies reliability limitations)
3. user friendly software (this is important)
4. live trading support (for down-times)
5. decent technical support
I'm not asking for much, am I?
I'm definitely not looking for the cheapest brokerage, but the best quality,
and best value, with all the above factors considered!
Thanks to any of you willing to offer suggestions!
Eliot
Eliot Kaplan
email: eliot@xxxxxxx
web: www.isu.com
Voice: 310.455.3950
Fax: 310.455.3085
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|