PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>test</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Nov 25 16:49:07 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mail.thetrellis.net ([208.179.56.11])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA08764
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:43:32 -0800
Received: from REALTRADERS.COM
([208.179.56.198])
by mail.thetrellis.net; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:36:57 -0800
Received: from harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net by realtraders.com
with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.5.0.R)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:34:33 +0000
Received: from ibm (1Cust98.tnt1.blythe.ca.da.uu.net [63.25.4.98])
by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA07621
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <027001bf32d5$f6c08c20$b797fea9@xxx>
From: "ROBERT ROESKE" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [realtraders] Gen - DROEX system {01}
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:35:07 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_026C_01BF3292.E4F2E1C0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Return-Path: bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDMailing-List: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MDSend-Notifications-To: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status: RO
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To review the basic DRoex system:<BR>Take the daily H - L and
average it for 5 days. Then multiply it by 16 and<BR>name it
Historical. Compare the Historical to the implied volatility.
If<BR>the Historical is less than implied then expect a short term rally in
the<BR>undelrying until Historical = implied. DR can correct me if I
have<BR>misinterpreted it.<BR><BR>The attached two .gifs show why the DRoex
system failed in the 1992 to 1997<BR>period and worked in the 1998 to 1999
period. It has to do with rising<BR>levels in both the VIX and the
annualized 5 day historical volatility as he<BR>defines it. In the early
period the historical was below the implied most<BR>of the time and generated no
trades. Then the historical and implied began<BR>rising but the historical
rose faster. In the last few years, the Dr's<BR>perceptions are valid and
make a decent system.<BR><BR>Suggestions might be to use another type of
historical volatility. Another<BR>might be to compare Hist and IV
differently. Perhaps normalizing both in<BR>some way would help. A
third would be to use a different endpoint detection<BR>to the rally than H =
IV. The third one alone would make a big difference<BR>in profitability
for the recent period. A fourth would be the radical idea<BR>that dispells
the notion that a system has to work over long periods of<BR>time. Markets
change and systems have to adapt or become extinct or be used<BR>when they are
at their best. Infact there is a trading methodology based on<BR>"what is
working now".<BR><BR>BobR<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: ROBERT
ROESKE <<A
href="mailto:bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx">bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>To:
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Cc:
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Sent:
Thursday, November 18, 1999 11:54 AM<BR>Subject: [realtraders] Gen - DROEX
system {01}<BR><BR><BR>> One thing I noticed on the last droex4.gif with data
back to 1992 is that<BR>> the first trade with the current code did not tick
off until 1997. The<BR>H -<BR>> L range of the OEX and the VIX behavior
in 1997 to 1992 must have been<BR>> different. So back to the drawing
board to see what is going on.<BR>><BR>> BR<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\1999.gif"
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\1992.gif"
|