|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=836121800-10101999>Gil,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=836121800-10101999>Microsoft have a
free download RegClean.exe that will remove unreferenced registry
entries. <A
href="http://support.microsoft.com/support/downloads/dp3049.asp";>http://support.microsoft.com/support/downloads/dp3049.asp</A></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=836121800-10101999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=836121800-10101999>I use it after every
uninstall.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=836121800-10101999>Jeff.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of</B> gil ward<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, 10 October 1999
1:02<BR><B>To:</B> tradersgroup@xxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Cc:</B>
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx; omega list<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [TradersGroup] Re:
Remove TS<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>FTI....I recently removed TS4 and a very quick
trial of TS2000i from my hard disk.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Last PM I ran a program called FIX-IT. Lo
and behold there were about 600 regristry entries still there pertaining to
omega.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Apparently, when un-installing ts, it leaves the
regristry entries in place.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anyone else have a comment about
this???</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Gil</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>PS I would think that an extra 600 reg.
entries would slow you down?</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Oct 09 19:21:36 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA22559
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 18:43:15 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id RAA19329
for realtraders-sendemout; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 17:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id RAA19315
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 17:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lego.zianet.com (lego.zianet.com [204.134.124.54])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id RAA23264
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 17:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [204.134.124.26] by lego.zianet.com (NTMail 4.20.0009/NT1100.00.c5a99e31) with ESMTP id osahiaaa for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 18:46:02 -0600
Received: from ruidoso0151.zianet.com (ruidoso0151.zianet.com [207.66.42.160]) by nova.zianet.com (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id pa574121 for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 18:39:20 -0600
Message-ID: <010801bf12b8$ea5d9ff0$152a42cf@xxxxxx>
From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <005201bf1290$beb22600$5ed552c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Long? Bonds1
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 18:45:34 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FB_01BF1286.78A5C270"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
Stig,
Thank you for posting such a well thought out commentary.
A few observations:
a) 17% swing appears to include too few samples to have significance
b) Neither H&S is confirmed by OBV which is 50% higher on right shoulder
than on left shoulder
c) The strong OBV puts one in the bullish camp
The 78% retracement level seems to be providing some very important support
holding up what every analyst agrees is a very bearish price formation
whether you call it a w.4 ABCDE or a bearish triangle. Swing over to the S&P
and we have a clear H&S with confirming OBV (using SPY volume or NYSE
volume) which has so-far failed to deliver the expected downside and the
major indicators are delivering conflicting signals. Finally, over on the
US$ front we have another clear H&S with confirming OBV which has broken but
has just retraced to the neckline. Unfortunately the US/DX correlation has
not reached +-.50 since 94 so the dollar is not much help.
The pundits are all in agreement that the employment numbers were an
abberation and I'm almost convinced ... but ... I don't know if anyone is
watching lumber these days but current prices are pointing to slack demand
in the housing market ... is that another abberation?
Directional evidence is hard to find!
Earl
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\USWEEK.gif"
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\DX_CC.gif"
|