[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trading Gen: The Duck - Astology



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



Andrew

  Wrong!  Your attack below is the oldest argument under the Sun by novices
trying to discredit our oldest science, Astrology.  Yes, Astrologers have known
about the precession of the equinox and that the constellations are moving
approximately one degree every 72 years. The signs and the constellations are
not the same and haven't been for at least 2000 years. The only time the
constellations and signs were approximately in the same place was for a brief
time 2,000 years ago. We also know that the Sun is the center of the Solar
system. This was discovered and written about over 2,000 years ago, even though
the myth about Copernicus making this discovery continues. As for your claims
discrediting Astrology, Astrologers know that the Sun is the center of the Solar
System but most Astrologers use an earth centered Astrology when they analyze an
Astrological chart. This is because we live on the Earth so we are interested in
events as they relate to Earth, not the Sun.  In the same way we perform this
analysis, we can also have scientific information about the Solar System yet
apply information in a different manner based on its relative practical value.
     Yes Astrology does work. Does it work 100% of the time? No. Does it work
better than any other method of forecasting turns in the markets. Probably. This
is not the time or place for a scientific presentation on proving Astrology
valid. However for those so inclined, check the research of the Michel &
Francois Gauquelin who showed, using a 500,000 population, that where the
planets are at birth influence what career one pursues.


Cheers,

Norman


wrote:

> Hear is something for you.  Astrology charts that are used today were
> created thousands of years ago.  (some time BC)
> So what... well, consider the movement of all heavenly bodies.  The planets,
> stars, solar systems, galaxies that are used
> to establish the base reference charts,  have moved over time.  In fact,
> they have moved so much that all, astrology signs are off by at least two
> signs.
>
> If you think you are a Cancer, your not.  Think you are a Taurus, Wrong, you
> not the bull, but something else.  Pisces, Nope.  Everyone's astrology sign
> is off.
> It's all out of wacky.    So look at a chart, find your sign and move to the
> right at least two characters. that will tell you what the real sign might
> be.
>
> Now for all those astrology traders, think what this means.  You are trading
> with bad data.  When you look at mars aligning with Jupiter, you are off by
> 2000 years of the universes movement.  (give or take a few centuries)
>
> This is conclusive proof that astrology is based on incorrect facts and
> false information and assumptions.   In a word, it is all a bunch of
> malarkey.
>
> Now with that said, I must admit that I take trades based on Japanese candle
> sticks , including Dragon Fly Reversals.  I have no idea why this patter
> works, but it has made a lot of money for me.
>
> Moral of the story.... if Astrology or anything works for you, my only
> advice can be:  Use it.
>
> Andrew.
>
> Ps.  Um... well,  could I get a copy of the rubber duck indicator?    You
> know... just for testing.... Honest, just testing!  :-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <walt@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 3:09 PM
> Subject: Trading Gen: The Duck
>
> > RTs,
> >
> > I originally created the "duck indicator" to show Gann and
> > Fibonacci proponents that charts tend to lend themselves well
> > to any ratio set. The indicator was created by developing
> > ratio sets from the measurements of a rubber duck.
> > Unfortunately, I don't have the original .gif charts that
> > went with the duck. I will have to create some new ones. :)
> >
> > The "duck" was found to call market turning points every bit
> > as well as Gann and Fib points.
> >
> > Walt
> >
> > ROBERT ROESKE wrote:
> > >
> > > Post a request to Walt Downs for the Duck Indicator.
> > > BobR
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: J. Rodney Grisham <grisham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: RAY RAFFURTY <rrraff@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 9:09 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Why so much tension, each and every week?
> > >
> > > > RAY RAFFURTY wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well put James.  I have been a member of RT's for over 3 years and
> have
> > > seen
> > > > > the departure of many members who posted original and creative ideas
> > > > > (remember the Duck Indicator?), but who have departed or became
> inactive
> > > > > because of this type of noise.  Lets all try to remember that before
> we
> > > > > criticize.
> > > >
> > > > I have not been on Realtraders long enough to remember the Duck
> > > > Indicator.  Can you, or other long time subscribers, provide
> > > > information on it?  All current readers could probably use a
> > > > creative idea or two.
> > > >
> > > > Rod
> > > >
> >
> >
> >