[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADMIN Several Problems addressed



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><html>
<font size=3>RealTraders,<br>
<br>
Just to keep you updated, here are some of the answers that I have
received regarding the problems I addressed earlier.&nbsp; The answers
are from the listserver people.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
John<br>
<br>
<br>
1. Max file size: I've raised this to 70 characters. I can make it higher
<br>
if you'd like, but I suspect if that's what your users are used to, it
<br>
should be okay. I also raised the digest to 2 million characters so that
<br>
only one should go out each day (that's why there was one out this <br>
morning... it was already at it's limit).<br>
<br>
2. The reason it's taking so long to send the mail (~15 minutes) is 
<br>
because of how we have the priority set up on the mailings. The mailings
<br>
are set to bulk, as that's what they are, but that makes them lower 
<br>
priority to our mail server. I asked about this be changed to
&quot;normal&quot; <br>
until we get the bulk-mailer installed (which will handle all bulk mail
<br>
separately and alleviate this problem). Haven't heard back on this
yet.<br>
<br>
3. Digest format, coming out in plain text instead of MIME. Erik is 
<br>
working on this one. He wasn't aware of this before now.<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>Teri<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<font size=3><blockquote type=cite cite>At 02:50 PM 6/14/99 -0400, you
wrote: <br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>RTer's,<br>
<br>
&nbsp; Just to keep you updated, I am looking to increase the file size
limit from approx 40k back to 65k for files sent to the listserver (same
as old listserver).&nbsp; As some of you know, your .gif files have
bounced due to the size limitation.&nbsp; If you would like to send a
chart,&nbsp; before we make the change, just make sure it is smaller than
40k which include any associated text.<br>
<br>
&nbsp; Digest - For those who have asked to be switched to digest
format.&nbsp; Several things you should know. 1. The new digest requires
us to manually make the switch per your request.&nbsp; Unfortunately, if
you send your request when we are not in the office, it may take until
sometime in the next business day for us to process it.&nbsp; Sorry for
the inconvenience. 2. For those that are already in the Digest, we have
received some suggestions that we try to revert back to the old style of
the digest. Answer- I have contacted the system engineers and they are
going to try but I do not know if they will be successful but they assure
me that they will try. 3. Problems with .gif in the download- I have also
informed the engineers on this issue as well....so we will see.<br>
<br>
Anyhow, I hope that you have had less of a headache than I have since we
made the change to the new listserver.&nbsp; Personally, for some reason,
I have received almost 2000 returned email errors since Friday and have
been removed from the system twice without knowing. Note, my removal was
because I was an administrator and this SHOULDN'T happen to you.<br>
<br>
Just thought I would keep you informed.<br>
Thanks again,<br>
John Boggio - RT Moderator<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Realtraders,<br>
<br>
Below you will find directions to either REMOVE yourself from the RT
Forum OR switch to the DIGEST format.&nbsp; I hope this helps.<br>
<br>
John Boggio - RT Moderator<br>
<br>
**********************<br>
REMOVE:<br>
<br>
If you ever want to REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an email
to:<br>
<br>
realtraders-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx OR newdomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br>
<br>
Please leave the &quot;SUBJECT&quot; blank<br>
<br>
In the &quot;BODY&quot; of the message, type:<br>
<br>
unsubscribe realtraders<br>
<br>
Please do not write anything else in the 'Body' of the message<br>
<br>
Note: This procedure will work for 99% of all subscribers. In the event
this procedure does not work for you because your email address somehow
changed from the address we have on file, please send a post to:
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or Boggio@xxxxxxxxx along with your email
address and we will take care of it for you. However, this alternate
process may take up to 2 business days.<br>
<br>
<br>
*******************<br>
Digest:<br>
<br>
<b>NOTE: The Digest Mode has to be converted by our administrator
manually.&nbsp; Therefore, we will do our very best to get your request
processed within 2 business days if not a lot sooner.&nbsp; Thank you for
your patients.<br>
<br>
</b>John Boggio<br>
<br>
&nbsp;<b>Changing to/from the Digest Format:<br>
</b>The Digest format allows you to limit the large number of RealTraders
emails to one larger email which contains a record of all of the emails
for that day.<br>
To subscribe to the digest list of realtraders, send an email to<br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF"><u>support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</font></u><font size=3>
<br>
with the following in the message body:<br>
<b>change realtraders subscription: digest<br>
</b>To resume getting mail as it is sent for realtraders, send an email
to<br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF"><u>support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</font></u><font size=3>
<br>
with the following in the message body:<br>
<b>change realtraders subscription: nodigest</b></blockquote><br>
</b></blockquote><br>
</font></b><br>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jun 14 20:53:33 1999
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (204.202.220.47)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.4) with SMTP id 01188;
	Mon, 14 Jun 1999 23:24:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id TAA13797
	for realtraders-sendemout; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id TAA13793
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.erols.com (smtp1.erols.com [207.172.3.234])
	by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id TAA20250
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DEFAULT (207-172-183-111.s111.tnt20.brd.va.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.183.111])
	by smtp1.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA24997
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3765DF9F.5223@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:07:43 -0700
From: Ned Markson <cnedgo@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: cnedgo@xxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04C-KIT  (Win95; U; 16bit)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GEN: Setting up charts for Gann Fans
References: <98eafea5.249433ee@xxxxxxx> <37633B35.530D@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: c3a2b14bb83fa8d09b63aa614093988b.10

FWIW, I'm showing a short term, low pivot reversal today consistent with
the SnP Gann Box support pattern discussed below. Narrative at the
website.

Not a trading recommendation, just my personal opinion.

Ned Markson
http://www.erols.com/cnedgo

Ned Markson wrote:
> 
> There is a gif of a Gann Box for the SnP at
> 
> http://www.erols.com/cnedgo/data1/archive/gannbox.gif
> 
> There are a couple of features of this figure that are interesting to
> note:
> 
> 1. The top of the Gann box was determined by the low on Oct 9, 1998. As
> shown in the gif, the top of the box provided significant resistance
> from the end of December to the end of February. Then after the
> resistance level at the top of the Gann box gave way it provided a
> support level for
> the next four months.
> 
> 2. The gann lines, defined by the low on Oct 9, 1998, exhibit well
> defined support resistance characteristics over extended periods of time
> and permit estimates of trading ranges.
> 
> 3. Intersections at the 90 degree points provide price inflections. A
> good example of this was the prior Gann Box where the 180 degree point
> coincided with the SnP high for 1998.
> 
> Neat stuff!
> 
> Ned Markson
> http://www.erols.com/cnedgo