|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
That error came up for me because it needs 120 meg of free space on
the drive it is on and an additional 25 meg on the C drive.
Dick
---stuart <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone had trouble with the new TradeStation 2000i giving
critical error messages during the Global
> Server setup? I am running BMI and wonder if this is an isolated
problem due to data feed, or can it
> be related to conflicts with added indicators? Calls into technical
service have never gotten past
> continual busy signals last week.
>
> -Stuart
>
> realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > REALTRADERS Digest 1093
> >
> > Topics covered in this issue include:
> >
> > 1) Re: Floor Trader Pivot Points
> > by "RAY RAFFURTY" <rrraff@xxxxxxxx>
> > 2) Re: Buyer Beware Clarification
> > by trade <vqualey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 3) Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
> > by Norman Phair <ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 4) Vendors
> > by OatTrader@xxxxxxx
> > 5) Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
> > by Norman Phair <ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (by way of
Kishore Rochey <kish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
> > 6) Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
> > by "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 7) Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
> > by "Dtrader" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 8) Re: P&F Charting - in need of desparate help
> > by BOTTrader@xxxxxxx
> > 9) Re: Trin?
> > by BOTTrader@xxxxxxx
> > 10) Re: Trin? / clarification
> > by BOTTrader@xxxxxxx
> > 11) Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
> > by "BrentinUtahsDixie" <brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 12) GEN - Andrews Pitchfork
> > by clydelee <clydelee@xxxxxxx>
> > 13) Question on risk management
> > by oattrader@xxxxxxx (OatTrader)
> > 14) Re: T-Bond Manual Results
> > by TTrue61470@xxxxxxx
> > 15) MKT - S&P monthly charts 1 of 2
> > by "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 16) MKT-Ru2000 June Contract
> > by "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 17) MKT S&P monthly charts 2 of 2
> > by "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 18) MKT Asia Pacific
> > by "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 19) Re: T-Bond Manual Results
> > by TTrue61470@xxxxxxx
> > 20) Re: RT Help for the Newbie
> > by "T-Bondtrader" <t-bondtrader@xxxxxxx>
> > 21) Re: RT Help for the Newbie
> > by OatTrader@xxxxxxx
> > 22) Fut: Sugar
> > by "BrentinUtahsDixie" <brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 23) smarter trading
> > by TraderJR@xxxxxxx
> > 24) Re: T-Bond Manual Results
> > by TTrue61470@xxxxxxx
> > 25) "What if Day Traders Had to Pass a Test?"
> > by Dick Crotinger <richinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 26) Re: GEN Technical Analysis books
> > by Stavros Hadjichristofi <stavrosc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 27) Re: GEN Technical Analysis books
> > by Ketayun <ketayun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 28) Re: GEN Technical Analysis books
> > by "Dtrader" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 29) Re: Day Trading Success
> > by Bernard Finn <sarber@xxxxxxxx>
> > 30) Re: Pivot trades
> > by Bernard Finn <sarber@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Re: Floor Trader Pivot Points
> > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 19:56:51 -0500
> > From: "RAY RAFFURTY" <rrraff@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: <staylor@xxxxxxx>,
> > "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi Stewart,
> >
> > Seem like every few months we have to go thru an exchange
like this
> > (do you remember Murray Math or Gary from Hawaii?) They seem to
last about
> > a week to 10 days, then one of two things happen, either the two
antagonists
> > will agree to disagree like gentlemen or one or both will go to
far and get
> > kicked off the list. Personally, I hope Bob and Bill will will
chose the
> > former, but either way it will end soon (I HOPE) as it is getting
very
> > tiresome.
> >
> > Good luck and good trading,
> > Ray Raffurty
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stewart Taylor <staylor@xxxxxxx>
> > To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 3:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: Floor Trader Pivot Points
> >
> > >
> > >Bill:
> > >
> > >I don't think its appropriate for you to constantly attack Bob,
> > >particularly just after he posts something that others find
useful and
> > >helpful to the list
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Re: Buyer Beware Clarification
> > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:47:45 -0800
> > From: trade <vqualey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Couldn't agree more! Vendors should be able to produce at least a
two
> > year profitable "audited" track record. If they can not do this, it
> > raises a red flag automaticaly.. like you said if you go to a
> > professional: Doctor, Laywer, money manager, etc.. you would like
proof
> > of their expertice before put your trust in them, and they have to
> > provide it.
> >
> > MS wrote:
> > > Randall,
> > >
> > > Your point is right on the mark !!!! What I find
interesting...is that in this
> > > industry the vendors expect the consumer to go back to the dark
ages and blindly
> > > cough up $$$$ just because they say so...being a responsible and
consciousous
> > > consumer....I have the right to get all the information
necessary before making
> > > a purchase...and that includes....hard, physical evidence that
the seller and
> > > their product is what they say it is...not just because they say
so. If I go to
> > > a doctor I have the right to check out everything about him,
before I accept his
> > > services or have him do surgery on me...the same goes for any
service provided
> > > or product offered....But no...not here....Bill doesn't think
he should have to
> > > provide evidence to his claims, and the only way he can provide
evidence that he
> > > can successfully trade his methodology is his brokerage
statement. No he can
> > > not promise or guarentee that the student will learn and be
successful. George
> > > Angell sells his methodology and offers 60 day money back
guarentee....If Bill's
> > > or any other scam artist...oh excuse me...vendor's product and
or services had
> > > any merit, they would put their money where their mouth is...but
guess
> > > what....he doesn't.... and keeps playing off the gullability of
others. I will
> > > continue to warn people off of people like Bill E.
> > >
> > > We are the power,
> > >
> > > Mark Seflin
> > >
> > > Randall Kurzon wrote:
> > >
> > > > I want to clarify a couple of points that were in my earlier
message that
> > > > may have been taken differently than their intended meaning.
When I referred
> > > > to a guarantee I wasn't asking for nor even thinking of a
guarantee that
> > > > Bill's manual would cause me or anyone else to be a profitable
bond trader.
> > > > No one can promise this. I want a guarantee that the content
is there. Any
> > > > one with just a little common sense will agree that $377.00
(plus shipping
> > > > etc.) is an AWFUL lot of money for a manual that you can not
look at before
> > > > you buy it. I can look at almost any other trading related
book in a
> > > > bookstore before I buy it. I can order from Trader's Press,
Amazon.com,
> > > > Barnes and Noble, and others with the ability to return the
book if it is
> > > > worthless to me. Why can't one have this same ability when
ordering from Mr.
> > > > Eykyn? Because it's too much bother to him? Well now THAT
pissed me off.
> > > >
> > > > I asked Mr. Eykyn to provide some sort of proof as to justify
the cost of
> > > > his manual. That proof could have included but was not limited
to account
> > > > statements (yes, there ARE people that do make them public!
Honest people
> > > > that is), legitimate testimonials or anything else to justify
such a price
> > > > for his manual. His reply basically said that he would provide
nothing
> > > > except his word and that of someone I had never heard of. OK,
I wasn't
> > > > expecting results from LBR saying she traded using Bill's
manual, just
> > > > something from *somebody* that had all appearances of being
legitimate. I
> > > > received a page of printed testimonials from Mr. Eykyn after
the fact but
> > > > none of the testimonials had names, addresses, or phone
numbers. If I were a
> > > > vendor offering a product for any price, large or small, I
would certainly
> > > > plan to ask some of my most successful customers if they would
provide a
> > > > testimonial showing that their success is related to my
product and allow
> > > > people to contact them. Otherwise the vendor can write all the
glowing
> > > > testimonials he wants. If no one was willing then I would then
have to prove
> > > > the value some other way, possibly through my own account
statements.
> > > >
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
> > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:42:55 -0800
> > From: Norman Phair <ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: brente@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Brent:
> >
> > The most important fact about any pattern. method, system or
whatever, is
> > like you said, how many times did it work. 3 out of 4, good
percentage
> > but not enough examples. 30 out of 60, enough examples probably
but %
> > is no good. What is the ideal? Hard to say, for example 21 out
of 30
> > maybe enough, 70%. But has it been tested back enough years to
cover
> > all types of markets. When I take a stock market indicator and
back
> > test it
> > I like to do the period from 1966 through 1974. It boils down to
the
>
=== message truncated ===
==
Big Lucky Dick
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|