[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Buyer Beware Clarification



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=x-user-defined http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1700"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Verdana>Please provide us with your personal 
experience with Bill's manual to justify your attacks on both him and his 
product.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Verdana></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana>Thank you,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana>Bob</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: MS &lt;<A 
href="mailto:mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR>To: 
RealTraders Discussion Group &lt;<A 
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR>Date: 
Saturday, March 20, 1999 3:26 PM<BR>Subject: Re: Buyer Beware 
Clarification<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>&gt;Randall,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Your point is 
right on the mark !!!!&nbsp; What I find interesting...is that in 
this<BR>&gt;industry the vendors expect the consumer to go back to the dark ages 
and blindly<BR>&gt;cough up $$$$ just because they say so...being a responsible 
and consciousous<BR>&gt;consumer....I have the right to get all the information 
necessary before making<BR>&gt;a purchase...and that includes....hard, physical 
evidence that the seller and<BR>&gt;their product is what they say it is...not 
just because they say so.&nbsp; If I go to<BR>&gt;a doctor I have the right to 
check out everything about him, before I accept his<BR>&gt;services or have him 
do surgery on me...the same goes for any service provided<BR>&gt;or product 
offered....But no...not here....Bill doesn't&nbsp; think he should have 
to<BR>&gt;provide evidence to his claims, and the only way he can provide 
evidence that he<BR>&gt;can successfully trade his methodology is his brokerage 
statement.&nbsp; No he can<BR>&gt;not promise or guarentee that the student will 
learn and be successful.&nbsp; George<BR>&gt;Angell sells his methodology and 
offers 60 day money back guarentee....If Bill's<BR>&gt;or any other scam 
artist...oh excuse me...vendor's product and or services had<BR>&gt;any merit, 
they would put their money where their mouth is...but guess<BR>&gt;what....he 
doesn't.... and keeps playing off the gullability of others.&nbsp; I 
will<BR>&gt;continue to warn people off of people like Bill E.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;We 
are the power,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Mark Seflin<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Randall Kurzon 
wrote:<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; I want to clarify a couple of points that were in my 
earlier message that<BR>&gt;&gt; may have been taken differently than their 
intended meaning. When I referred<BR>&gt;&gt; to a guarantee I wasn't asking for 
nor even thinking of a guarantee that<BR>&gt;&gt; Bill's manual would cause me 
or anyone else to be a profitable bond trader.<BR>&gt;&gt; No one can promise 
this. I want a guarantee that the content is there. Any<BR>&gt;&gt; one with 
just a little common sense will agree that $377.00 (plus shipping<BR>&gt;&gt; 
etc.) is an AWFUL lot of money for a manual that you can not look at 
before<BR>&gt;&gt; you buy it. I can look at almost any other trading related 
book in a<BR>&gt;&gt; bookstore before I buy it. I can order from Trader's 
Press, Amazon.com,<BR>&gt;&gt; Barnes and Noble, and others with the ability to 
return the book if it is<BR>&gt;&gt; worthless to me. Why can't one have this 
same ability when ordering from Mr.<BR>&gt;&gt; Eykyn? Because it's too much 
bother to him? Well now THAT pissed me off.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; I asked Mr. 
Eykyn to provide some sort of proof as to justify the cost of<BR>&gt;&gt; his 
manual. That proof could have included but was not limited to 
account<BR>&gt;&gt; statements (yes, there ARE people that do make them public! 
Honest people<BR>&gt;&gt; that is), legitimate testimonials or anything else to 
justify such a price<BR>&gt;&gt; for his manual. His reply basically said that 
he would provide nothing<BR>&gt;&gt; except his word and that of someone I had 
never heard of. OK, I wasn't<BR>&gt;&gt; expecting results from LBR saying she 
traded using Bill's manual, just<BR>&gt;&gt; something from *somebody* that had 
all appearances of being legitimate. I<BR>&gt;&gt; received a page of printed 
testimonials from Mr. Eykyn after the fact but<BR>&gt;&gt; none of the 
testimonials had names, addresses, or phone numbers. If I were a<BR>&gt;&gt; 
vendor offering a product for any price, large or small, I would 
certainly<BR>&gt;&gt; plan to ask some of my most successful customers if they 
would provide a<BR>&gt;&gt; testimonial showing that their success is related to 
my product and allow<BR>&gt;&gt; people to contact them. Otherwise the vendor 
can write all the glowing<BR>&gt;&gt; testimonials he wants. If no one was 
willing then I would then have to prove<BR>&gt;&gt; the value some other way, 
possibly through my own account statements.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;</BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Mar 20 17:21:11 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 9917
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:03:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id QAA15096;
	Sat, 20 Mar 1999 16:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.ASPI.net (ns.ASPI.net [207.228.215.2])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id QAA14957
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 16:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rrraff (Dialup1-X600-254.Aspi.net [207.228.215.254])
          by www.ASPI.net (2.5 Build 2639 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id TAA18175; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 19:58:31 -0500
Message-Id: <006801be7335$b584e900$fed7e4cf@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 19:56:51 -0500
Reply-To: "RAY RAFFURTY" <rrraff@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "RAY RAFFURTY" <rrraff@xxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Floor Trader Pivot Points
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: <staylor@xxxxxxx>,
        "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: d2c860521b5e857b9eec960b03b9dda3.03

        Hi Stewart,

        Seem like every few months we have to go thru an exchange like this
(do you remember Murray Math or Gary from Hawaii?)  They seem to last about
a week to 10 days, then one of two things happen, either the two antagonists
will agree to disagree like gentlemen or one or both will go to far and get
kicked off the list.  Personally, I hope Bob and Bill will will chose the
former, but either way it will end soon (I HOPE) as it is getting very
tiresome.

                                        Good luck and good trading,
                                                    Ray Raffurty

-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Taylor <staylor@xxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Floor Trader Pivot Points


>
>Bill:
>
>I don't think its appropriate for you to constantly attack Bob,
>particularly just after he posts something that others find useful and
>helpful to the list