PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Not that I care who gets credit, but who has time to research all the past
writings before you can say something about something. The problem as I see
it
is that almost nobody bothers to say what percentage of the time a pattern
worked
over the last umteen years.
Brent
-----Original Message-----
From: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
>How would this differ from Edwards and Magee's "Broadening Top" formation?
>Not that it necessarily applies in this case, however I'm amazed at how
>often, while reading an article on some original work or research, the
>author rediscovers E&M's work some 50+ years ago without credit.
>
>Earl
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: R.E.Turner <rturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 3:45 PM
>Subject: Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
>
>
>>Slight correction of my interpretation of the WolfeWave numbering scheme,
>>as gleaned from "Street Smarts" and the basic architecture faxed to me by
>>Wolfe. Comments by someone who actually studied under Wolfe would be
>>helpful since it appears that there are projection and predictive
qualities
>>to the Wolfe Wave.
>> Russ-----Original Message-----
>>From: R.E.Turner <rturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 8:25 AM
>>Subject: Re: Wolfe Wave on SnP
>>
>>
>>>Kevin,
>>> My interpretation ofr the Wolfe Wave is slighlly different. We're
>not
>>>quite to the top of Wave 6 on the SnP, with a potential for a down
>>>Wave 7(or shifting one cycle to the right, 7 becomes a new 5). The top
>of
>>>Wave 6 is closer to the trendline drawn from point 1 through point 4.
>>Again
>>>just my interpretation, never took Wolfe's $2500 course
>>>Russ
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Kevin Shin <kalalex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 2:57 AM
>>>Subject: Wolfe Wave on SnP
>>>
>>>
>>>>I wonder if there's any Wolfe Wave follower.
>>>>It seems like SP's posing for the wave setup.
>>>>I'm not saying that we saw the top by any means.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
|