|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Just got a flyer for the "New And
Improved" MS v6.52 for the piddly sum of $59.00.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The only question I have is, is this the same
upgrade that has been such a hot topic for the past few months. Or if I
pay the $59 will I the get "real" version that actually
works??</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Feb 28 17:46:50 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 21459
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 19:17:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA05756
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 07:45:30 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA05753
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 07:45:28 -0700
Received: from smtp1.ncal.verio.com (smtp1.ncal.verio.com [204.247.247.82])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA18387
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:42:23 -0700 (MST)
Received: from corkie (oak-alg-gw10-36.ncal.verio.com [207.21.140.227])
by smtp1.ncal.verio.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA15031;
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <003901be61e0$3ef450c0$e38c15cf@xxxxxx>
From: "Animal" <animal@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Realtraders User Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Metastock User Group" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MetaStock v6.52
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:32:02 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0036_01BE619D.28202E70"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 50b898999ff222bc5c82850c172737cc.1d
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Just got a flyer for the "New And
Improved" MS v6.52 for the piddly sum of $59.00.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The only question I have is, is this the same
upgrade that has been such a hot topic for the past few months. Or if I
pay the $59 will I the get "real" version that actually
works??</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Feb 28 17:46:43 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 12191
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 18:46:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id PAA19098;
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo11.mx.aol.com (imo11.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id PAA18740
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:38:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ALVIS2JS@xxxxxxx
by imo11.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id HGSGa04317
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 18:33:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <80628ca5.36d72f34@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 18:33:08 EST
Reply-To: ALVIS2JS@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: ALVIS2JS@xxxxxxx
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: BMI Satellite Trouble
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 18
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 491a434e793bc7aa4bb71999a240bc83.1a
RTers,
I lost my BMI Satellite signal (the dreaded "unlock") Thursday afternoon about
2:30 ET. The BMI tech dept. assumed hardware failure and overnighted me a new
receiver. I installed new box today - still no signal. Called BMI Friday
afternoon just as they were getting email to the effect that the problem stems
from a strong new signal from Telestar 5 that is interfering with BMI signal
from Galaxy 3R. The tech I spoke with suggested that I should contact a
satellite service to come and use a digital meter to precisely adjust my dish
1/4 to 1/2 degree to the East, thus zeroing in on Galaxy 3R better than one is
likely to achieve using just the receiver box alone. The tech said BMI will
issue a credit of up to $100 for this service if you send in the original
receipt. He also said info about this problem would soon be posted on the
web site - www.bmiquotes.com.
This information is preliminary and second hand and is only posted as a heads
up for others who may be suffering similar problems. My problem may be
compounded by the fact that here in North Carolina, I am on the edge of the
satellite "footprint". If you have additional or better information, please
post it.
Regards,
Jim Alvis
|