[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: True Range Volatility Breakout



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hi Scot

Very interesting post.   Should frighten the hell out of anyone operating
any of the  'systems' that are commonly advertised in Futures Magazine or
any other well-known trading publication.

Can you tell us any - repeat any - system you have so tested, in the manner
you have so stated, and what the results have been.

Once we know, I am sure the originator of the system will be inundated with
inquiries...

Bill Eykyn




-----Original Message-----
From: Scot Billington <scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, April 28, 1998 3:06 pm
Subject: Re: True Range Volatility Breakout


>>Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:40:59 -0500
>>To: tgparker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>From: Scot Billington <scot.billington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: True Range Volatility Breakout
>>In-Reply-To: <3545C756.C1C9F1F4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>References: <3545A112.3BCD4632@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>I would like to make some comments here that are critical, but not meant to
>be offensive.
>
>
>>>The trick seems to be picking the markets that seem to model the system
>>>best, and stay away from those that don't. Some markets have been a dream
>>>to trade, and then a couple of the grain markets almost destroyed me.
>>
>This is a prime example of curve fitting.  If the technical system has a
>market edge it will work across all markets, and it is advisable to trade
>as many markets as possible.  Certain market modes, i.e. trending or
>non-trending, will result in better returns for a given system.  However,
>just because a particular market has trended well in the past few years
>does not make it more likely to trend in the future.  If the system only
>'works' on a few markets, the system doesn't work.
>>
>>>Identifying and getting out of the "false breakouts" fast also seems to
be
>>>a necessary acquired skill that's cost me a lot of money to learn.
>>>
>>>I'm learning that the problem with "system" trading you have to somehow
>>>learn when to pay attention to the system and when to ignore it and
listen
>>>to common sense. The trouble with being a "newbie" is you don't know when
>>>the system is running you over a cliff.
>
>
>I think this comment is a good example of where most 'system' traders go
>wrong.  Firstly, sometimes taking the signals and sometime listening to
>"common sense", is discretionary not systematic trading.  Secondly, notice
>the undefined term "common sense".  I find it impossible to create a
>working trading plan around "common sense".
>
>>>I got the feeling TRABOS is a rather "oldie but goodie" type of system..
>>>i.e.
>>>"cave-man" type of trading. Lot's of grunt work, and no heroics.
>
>Assuming heroics means enormous returns, this is another common mistake
>made by new traders.  They forget the power of compounding and are
>facinated by grandiose claims.  At 25% a year $25,000 turns into $888,178
>by the time your newborn can drive (You will need it for the insurance.).
>That year it will earn you $222,000 almost 10 times your initial
investment.
>
>My suggestion is to take the TRABOS system and CORRECTLY backtest it
>yourself on a portfolio of markets two from each sector, grains, meats,
>energy, currency, interest rates, stock index (one only).  Follow the rules
>to the letter and use $150/round turn in commission and slippage over a 250
>trade sample.  Run statistical tests every 50 trades to check the
>robustness of the system.  If it is profitable, you should now have
>confidence to take every trade signal generated.  If you are not, backtest
>another 250 trades or follow it realtime for several months.  You now need
>to develop a money management strategy that will give you the return
>drawdown ratio that you find comfortable.  I would figure out the
>probabilities of various drawdown levels etc.  Lastly, you must develop the
>discipline to trade your new winning plan.  Trade it for a month.  Keep a
>diary and a log of each trade.  If you skipped any signal or fudged any
>rule even if it resulted in more profit or less loss, your discipline needs
>work.
>
>
>