[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BMI vs CQG



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Ditto. My fills on DJ are in excellent agreement with the BMI satellite
feed.

Allan
_____________________________

JDFO wrote:
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Hutchison <jghutchison@xxxxxxx>
> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 1998 2:54 AM
> Subject: BMI vs CQG
> 
> >I day trade and have access to BMI which serves my TradeStation software,
> >PCQuote via satalite feed, and a direct TI line to NASDAQ.
> >
> >It is not unusual for the BMI signal to lag the PCQuote data and the TI
> >line signal by as much as ten minutes.  This lag frequently occurs on
> >market open and gradually catches up.  It is interesting since both BMI and
> >PCQuote signals are broadcast by the same Galaxy 4 satalite.
> >
> >If you use the BMI data feed under these conditions to day trade using
> >market orders, you are trading in what I call the black hole,  e.g.
> >shooting in the dark.
> >
> >Be forewarned.
> >
> >I'd be interested to hear what other traders experiences have been with BMI
> >and other data vendors.
> >
> >
> >
> >Jack Hutchison
> 
> Hey Jack:
> >I  daytraded with BMI S&P  data and Trade Station  and would listen via the
> telephone to my broker as he was placing my order.  He had a direct line to
> the floor. My BMI quotes were exactly the same as my broker was hearing from
> the floor and my fills, for the most part, were excellent.  Every once in a
> while the BMI price on my screen  would lag by a few seconds, usually in a
> fast moving environment, but I never had any real problems.
>     Signal is another story, however.  But BMI, no problem.
> Regards,
> jdfo@xxxxxxxxx