|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Having watched & talked to Gary & Alex over the last, God, how many
years? Can I say on behalf of the list..
mwuahahaha...
*wipes eyes*
thanks, that was priceless.
IVT wrote:
it never had any edge at all, a stupid thing to do.
you two guys are talking to yourself.
--- Gary Fritz <fritz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, I don't think T3 ever gave the original JMA a run for its
money. I saw the performance of the original JMA. T3 had more lag
and overshoot. T3 also can't adapt to sudden changes (like when
there's a limit move) without requiring significant settling time.
JMA always did better than T3, but T3 was free. I suspect there
are not that many people who could actually make profitable use of
the differences between T3 and JMA. Mark told me (years ago) that
he thought T3 was a formidable competitor and that he wanted to
improve JMA to give it more of an edge.
Yes, JMA responds much better to sudden moves than T3 does.
Gary
|