|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
it never had any edge at all, a stupid thing to do.
you two guys are talking to yourself.
--- Gary Fritz <fritz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > However, I don't think T3 ever gave the original JMA a run for its
> > money. I saw the performance of the original JMA. T3 had more lag
> > and overshoot. T3 also can't adapt to sudden changes (like when
> > there's a limit move) without requiring significant settling time.
>
> JMA always did better than T3, but T3 was free. I suspect there
> are not that many people who could actually make profitable use of
> the differences between T3 and JMA. Mark told me (years ago) that
> he thought T3 was a formidable competitor and that he wanted to
> improve JMA to give it more of an edge.
>
> Yes, JMA responds much better to sudden moves than T3 does.
> Gary
|