|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> However, I don't think T3 ever gave the original JMA a run for its
> money. I saw the performance of the original JMA. T3 had more lag
> and overshoot. T3 also can't adapt to sudden changes (like when
> there's a limit move) without requiring significant settling time.
JMA always did better than T3, but T3 was free. I suspect there are
not that many people who could actually make profitable use of the
differences between T3 and JMA. Mark told me (years ago) that he
thought T3 was a formidable competitor and that he wanted to improve
JMA to give it more of an edge.
Yes, JMA responds much better to sudden moves than T3 does.
Gary
|