[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ?Legal Question:?? What is REAL TIME???



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

The problem with a satellite is obvious. They can't make the changes
necessary to handle the increased work load. There is no intention to have
the data anything but real time.
Just the transmission delay adds 4 sec.

Jim Bronke
Phoenix, AZ



----- Original Message -----
From: "a a" <goldcapstone@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jim Bronke" <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: ?Legal Question:?? What is REAL TIME???


: Hey Jim,
: Thanks for the response.  It is possible that their
: arguement could be technical limitations, however, if
: it is, then an upgrade by that company to meet the
: requirements of the law is in order.  My complaint is
: that I see no current law that creates a standard that
: must be complied with before a company can call their
: data REAL TIME.  Can I send data out 5 Minutes delayed
: and Call it real time?  If not, why not?  If there is
: a standard there what is it?  If not, why isn't there
: one?
: A
:
:
: --- Jim Bronke <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > They would argue that it is technical limitations.
: > Which it is. They just
: > don't spend any time criticizing their own
: > operation. We learn the hard way.
: >
: > Jim Bronke
: > Phoenix, AZ
: >
: >
: >
: > ----- Original Message -----
: > From: "a a" <goldcapstone@xxxxxxxxx>
: > To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
: > Cc: "TaoOfDow" <taoofdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:20 AM
: > Subject: ?Legal Question:?? What is REAL TIME???
: >
: >
: > : Group,
: > : Consider this.  There have been some on the list
: > who
: > : have complained that their feed is frequently
: > behind
: > : 30 seconds, sometimes as much as 2 minutes.  Is it
: > : possible that there are NO LAWS regulating such
: > : things?  How is it not possible for the FCC to be
: > : involved in this matter. Why the silence?  Without
: > a
: > : legal background, one would have to conclude that
: > : there are no laws regulating this, making it 'OK'
: > to
: > : charge $295\mo. for real time data that isn't
: > 'REAL
: > : TIME'. Charging for REAL TIME DATA, when the data
: > is
: > : DELAYED for all practical uses, is in my opinion a
: > : dishonest and crooked act perpetuated on the
: > trading
: > : public.
: > : IN SHORT:  What is REAL TIME DATA?
: > : Awaiting discussion,
: > : A
: > :
: >
: >
:
: