Re: ?Legal Question:?? What is REAL TIME???

[a a <goldcapstone@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jim,your an engineer and computer whiz, so your
obviously logical.  Logically solving the issue I
bring up cannot be directed towards the companies
until we first define what Real Time is, legally.  If
the companies are within their rights, the problems
they have getting there data out is an issue that has
no legal consiquence, only commercial.  If however,
the FCC defines 'EAL TIME'as say,... "within 10 sec.
from reception from exchange" then, the companies that
do not meet the requirements have a problem... but not
until the definition of 'REAL TIME' comes to light. 
Thus the question remains, What Is Real Time?
A



--- Jim Bronke <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The problem with a satellite is obvious. They can't
> make the changes
> necessary to handle the increased work load. There
> is no intention to have
> the data anything but real time.
> Just the transmission delay adds 4 sec.
> 
> Jim Bronke
> Phoenix, AZ
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "a a" <goldcapstone@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Jim Bronke" <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:04 AM
> Subject: Re: ?Legal Question:?? What is REAL TIME???
> 
> 
> : Hey Jim,
> : Thanks for the response.  It is possible that
> their
> : arguement could be technical limitations, however,
> if
> : it is, then an upgrade by that company to meet the
> : requirements of the law is in order.  My complaint
> is
> : that I see no current law that creates a standard
> that
> : must be complied with before a company can call
> their
> : data REAL TIME.  Can I send data out 5 Minutes
> delayed
> : and Call it real time?  If not, why not?  If there
> is
> : a standard there what is it?  If not, why isn't
> there
> : one?
> : A
> :
> :
> : --- Jim Bronke <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> : > They would argue that it is technical
> limitations.
> : > Which it is. They just
> : > don't spend any time criticizing their own
> : > operation. We learn the hard way.
> : >
> : > Jim Bronke
> : > Phoenix, AZ
> : >
> : >
> : >
> : > ----- Original Message -----
> : > From: "a a" <goldcapstone@xxxxxxxxx>
> : > To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> : > Cc: "TaoOfDow" <taoofdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:20 AM
> : > Subject: ?Legal Question:?? What is REAL TIME???
> : >
> : >
> : > : Group,
> : > : Consider this.  There have been some on the
> list
> : > who
> : > : have complained that their feed is frequently
> : > behind
> : > : 30 seconds, sometimes as much as 2 minutes. 
> Is it
> : > : possible that there are NO LAWS regulating
> such
> : > : things?  How is it not possible for the FCC to
> be
> : > : involved in this matter. Why the silence? 
> Without
> : > a
> : > : legal background, one would have to conclude
> that
> : > : there are no laws regulating this, making it
> 'OK'
> : > to
> : > : charge $295\mo. for real time data that isn't
> : > 'REAL
> : > : TIME'. Charging for REAL TIME DATA, when the
> data
> : > is
> : > : DELAYED for all practical uses, is in my
> opinion a
> : > : dishonest and crooked act perpetuated on the
> : > trading
> : > : public.
> : > : IN SHORT:  What is REAL TIME DATA?
> : > : Awaiting discussion,
> : > : A
> : > :
> : >
> : >
> :
> :
> 
>