|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ok, Mark. Thanks. I guess I will have to follow my own rule as well.
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Brown" <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re[4]: omega-digest Digest V101 #206
Hello Don,
i apologize that i was not clear, i was not attacking the guy for
trying tell those poor unenlightened people that scam was a trick ect.
i was just sorta kidding him that he was probably wasting his time
like talking to a rock.
my humor is dry i know, but i don't care if i insulted the monkeys
cause i would never wanna lay with them anyway. i do care about those
who are not ignorant. but when someone is ignorant, i care enough to
try the shock treatment on them - you know like those monkey's get in
the lab. isn't the world just a lab?
ps from now on don can you take the time to place a proper heading in
the subject line rather than using the digest header, it would be
better. and thank you for your admonishment i deserved it.
DR> Slamming an individual for giving a straightforward and instructive
answer
DR> is certainly not admirable by any nor is it conducive to free exchange
of
DR> information in a group. Let go of some of your anger and preconceived
ideas
DR> about some of our fellow members. If they deserve an attack, I am sure
you
DR> will not hold back, but to body slam verbally, an individual for no
reason
DR> except who he is, is a defenseless tactic meant to intimidate former
DR> competitors and people-please your friends. I do not think they are
DR> impressed, Mark. I like you and respect you, but this kind of attack is
not
DR> wanted by anyone here, I suspect. Try writing an angry letter, and then
not
DR> sending it for a day: then see if it is still warranted or just a
impulsive
DR> act of anger related to "old baggage".
DR> Respectfully,
DR> Don
--
Have a Great Day, Mark
http://www.markbrown.com
|