[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HD access times



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

On win2000 they said that one drive the secondary would say PIO when the
change was implemented. My drivers say that it is running in UDMA mode. I
just bought a UDMA ATA100 PCI card that boasts it is faster than the
resident IDE ATA100 system. I'll find out shortly.

Jim Bronke
Phoenix, AZ



----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Burgess" <bburgess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Bob Scott" <rlscott@xxxxxxxx>; "Jim Bronke" <jvbronke@xxxxxxxx>; "Omega
List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: HD access times


>
>
> > Your Welcome Bill.
> > Thanks goes to Bill Wynne for getting this thread started. It alerted me
> to
> > the weakness that had existed in Win2000. I've just received a response
to
> a
> > query to my motherboard manufacture(IWill) and find out that it has a BX
> > chipset which only supports ATA33. Seems that you have to read between
the
> > lines when you buy these boards. They talk about their components like
> they
> > are the latest and greatest but then you find out they are not. I'm
going
> to
> > try to add an add on IDE driver board that will get the job done.
>
> It does not matter much if the board is ATA 33 or 66. The main problem is
> getting your disk to be read is UDMA rather than PIO
> My original tests are below and I was at a loss to figure out why the P700
> was so slow
>
> I tested the following on a number of systems
>  Read  & write mode mode: 65536 blocks - Test file size: 10Mb
> CPU         Op Sys   ATA    read    write
> P500        Win2000    66     19284 13281
> P700       NTSP6     66       3385   2662
> P400       Win98SE  33      5234   5389
> P350       Win98SE  Old     5130   4980
> P333       NTSP6      33      3256    2228
>
> Here are the new results on the P700 changing to UDMA
> P700       NT SP6     66     10882   9650
> This is greater than a 220% improvement
> Thanks to Bob Perry
> I found the following site that was useful
> http://www.benchtest.com/nt_udma1.html
> It is not just the improved I/O but the reduction on CPU utilization
> Thanks to all that got me started on this track - it has made a big
> improvemnt.
>
>
>
>