|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
The simulated feed from Marketsound.com is pretty much in step with the
mini. It reads from the mini feed so it can't lead the quotes. 365
Squawk is behind everything by a mile. The only benefit they offer
(imo) is player and size. Even getting this 20 seconds late might be of
little value to some.
Keith
Ullrich Fischer wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried this test with the www.cme.com/fe50 simulated squawk? Is
> there any time stamp there to compare against? How about comparing the cme
> free feed to 365 squawk? Anyone done that?
>
> At 11:54 AM 4/6/2001 -0400, Jim Johnson wrote:
> >Hello Cash,
> >
> >I did the same little test this AM. I use FutureSource for data and
> >DSL for internet. At open the live365 squawk was about 20 behind
> >relative to atomic clock. Later in the morning the lag was 13-15
> >seconds. My data seems to be 5--7 seconds ahead of the squawk.
> >
> >Best regards,
> > Jim Johnson
> >
> >Friday, April 06, 2001, 8:33:21 AM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >C> Wow! Smart idea! I gotta try that with my pay squawk.
> >
> >C> On 5 Apr 2001, at 14:06, Sean O'Toole wrote:
> >
> > >> 'Ran a little test this morning. I listened for the bracket sirens on the
> > >> live 365 squawk box and found them to be 7 to 8 seconds behind my atomic
> > >> clock sync'ed computer clock. Both the CME and the CBOT used to set
> > to the
> > >> atomic clock in Denver every morning at about 6:00.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Chris Cheatham [mailto:nchrisc@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > >> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:59 AM
> > >> > To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >> > Subject: Re: Free SP live squawk for all TS users
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I have been counting 15-20 seconds on average between mini move
> > >> > to new price
> > >> > range and hearing it on 365. Even my slowboat Futuresource SPs come in
> > >> > faster.
> > >> >
> > >> > Chris
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> > mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxx
|