|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Has anyone tried this test with the www.cme.com/fe50 simulated squawk? Is
there any time stamp there to compare against? How about comparing the cme
free feed to 365 squawk? Anyone done that?
At 11:54 AM 4/6/2001 -0400, Jim Johnson wrote:
>Hello Cash,
>
>I did the same little test this AM. I use FutureSource for data and
>DSL for internet. At open the live365 squawk was about 20 behind
>relative to atomic clock. Later in the morning the lag was 13-15
>seconds. My data seems to be 5--7 seconds ahead of the squawk.
>
>Best regards,
> Jim Johnson
>
>Friday, April 06, 2001, 8:33:21 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>C> Wow! Smart idea! I gotta try that with my pay squawk.
>
>C> On 5 Apr 2001, at 14:06, Sean O'Toole wrote:
>
> >> 'Ran a little test this morning. I listened for the bracket sirens on the
> >> live 365 squawk box and found them to be 7 to 8 seconds behind my atomic
> >> clock sync'ed computer clock. Both the CME and the CBOT used to set
> to the
> >> atomic clock in Denver every morning at about 6:00.
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Chris Cheatham [mailto:nchrisc@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:59 AM
> >> > To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: Re: Free SP live squawk for all TS users
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I have been counting 15-20 seconds on average between mini move
> >> > to new price
> >> > range and hearing it on 365. Even my slowboat Futuresource SPs come in
> >> > faster.
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
>
>--
> mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxx
|