[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: stocks suck...electronic futures "rule"-margin requirements



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

The CBOE has said they will list single stock futures as a defensive measure. 
 But the more telling item is this.  What is the single largest source of 
volume of the NYSE?  The answer: The CBOE.  Wouldn't the CBOE like to move 
some of that volume in house?  The weekly statistics from the NYSE show about 
25% of its volume comes from program trading.  This is "trading" volume, not 
"investing" volume.

Regards,

John J. Lothian 

Disclosure: Futures trading involves financial risk, lots of it!

In a message dated 2/18/01 10:11:05 PM Central Standard Time, 
prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< Based on strong competition from the CBOE, stock futures in the US are
 doomed unless:
 
 1) they provide much more rapid trade execution than options
 
 2) have more liquidity than options
 
 3) provide AS MUCH or more LEVERAGE than options
 
 4) have 23 hr per day trading coverage
 
 No question, only the high volume stocks will be justified for this new
 vehicle.
 I believe they will have a good chance if ALL 4 items above are attained.
 #1 should certainly be easy to attain via electronic trading interface, and
 #2 is a matter of marketing and promotion;
 #3 is very questionable if the FED is involved (kiss-of-death)
 #4 easily done
 
 So, again, #3 is the "key" to success. >>