|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Seems you missed the point: DS/TS4 IS handling several
hundred symbols, stcc's, and systems....YOUR tests
show TSpro does not....I'm not sure what you're so defensive about :)
BW
>From: "Bilo Selhi" <citadel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Bill Wynne" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
><RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: STRESS TESTING TS Pro Update...
>Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:03:50 -0500
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Bill Wynne <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <citadel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:42 PM
>Subject: Re: STRESS TESTING TS Pro Update...
>
>
> > >From: "Bilo Selhi" <citadel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ron Augustine" <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: Re: STRESS TESTING TS Pro Update...
> > >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:37:02 -0500
> > >
> > >it all depends on how you much it is when say "do well".
> > >for someone it might be a thousand bucks a day for others
> > >it might be 100 times that...
> > >for someone it might be 1 symbol and for someone it might
> > >be 100 symbols...
> > >you can make a living or you can make a fortune...
> >
> > I hope you are not saying the more symbols you trade, the better you
>trade.
> > Some of the best traders I know only trade one market, while some of the
> > worst are all over the place.
>
>yeah, yeah, yeah, whatever...
>my best advice is when you get there you'll understand...
> >
> > >what would make me happy is if could run my system on at least 50
>symbols
> > >that are in my porfolio with atcc working and alerts working without
> > >delays.. so i don't have to look at the charts and mental masturbate
>myself
> > >to death trying to figure out what to
> > >do now... been there done that...
> > >when your system is doing the workload for you that
> > >on 50-100 symbols vs staring at qcharts all day... that's an edge.
> >
> > Ironicly, I understand that there are guys running
> > several hundred high volume stocks on TS4/Dynastore/Qfeed
> > all with systems and STCC's. Of course, QCharts is just
> > a little freebie add-on, but it has some cool scanning tools for us
>still
>on
> > the lower rungs of the evolutionary ladder ;)....and data on demand if
>TS
> > crashes.
> >
>
>data on demand is not crashing... that's bs.
I didn't say data on demand is crashing. What are you talking about?
>dynastore... the reason why i don't mess with that is that i would have
>to buy too much aspirine for my headaches... qcharts... i am bored...
>what is it... qcharts now 79 bucks a month? why the hell would you want
>to mess with qcharts/dynastore and ts 4.0 when you can get tradestation
>pro for $99 a month... it think the cliche is "stuck on the evolutionary
>ladder"
>
>( dynastore was initially designed by russkies so that
>they could run reuters on 4.0 in eastern europe... then our american
>fellow junkie basement traders came up with an idea to bypass those bmi
>charges
>hence the qchart wave... )
>
>why mess with that stuff now. evolve... you should be able to afford $99
>a month for the new pro... i mean it's about 3 bucks per day....
>damn it you gotta clime up a bit on that evolutionary ladder...
>
> > BW
> >
> > >
> > >just a different level on the evolution ladder, my friend :-)
> > >and when this is accomplished than there is the next step,
> > >better trading platfrom, better system, higher money level...
> > >never ending process of evolving as a trader...
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Ron Augustine <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:32 PM
> > >Subject: Re: STRESS TESTING TS Pro Update...
> > >
> > >
> > > > Sounds like great benchmark testing and its always interesting to
>read
> > > > about technical limitations, but my question deals with what amount
>of
> > > > resources a successful real-world trader really needs.
> > > >
> > > > I used TS4 for seven years and did very well with it -- I never
>upgraded
> > >to
> > > > TS2K for reasons that had nothing to do with Omega or TS, and
>eventually
> > > > migrated to QCharts and other software.
> > > >
> > > > It is possible to do very well following very few issues. Several
> > >charts
> > > > of the same issue in different time-frames-- with a few charts of
> > >different
> > > > issues running in the background just in case you need to look at
>them.
> > >I
> > > > can call up a whole new array of charts of a different ticker symbol
> > >with
> > >a
> > > > few keystrokes --
> > > >
> > > > 50 or 80 charts with various indicators, systems, etc. -- WHY?
> > > >
> > > > My suggestion would be to spend more time learning to trade well--
>not
> > > > following multitudes of charts.
> > > >
> > > > Why try to stuff 100 people into a Volkswagen Beetle hoping that one
>or
> > >two
> > > > make it to the end of the road, when it probably makes much more
>sense
> > >to
> > > > be selective about who you allow into the vehicle and how long they
> > >stay?
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > At 06:21 PM 02/14/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > >well,
> > > > >i finally got tradestaion pro installed on '98, NT and Win2000.
> > > > >here are some observations about win2000 ( i describe my
> > > > >exploits in '98 and NT earlier ).
> > > > >i decided to stress test Pro on win2000 brand new machine
> > > > >with purpose of finding out if it's capable of trading a portfolio
> > > > >consisting of about 50-100 symbols...
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
|