|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
it all depends on how you much it is when say "do well".
for someone it might be a thousand bucks a day for others
it might be 100 times that...
for someone it might be 1 symbol and for someone it might
be 100 symbols...
you can make a living or you can make a fortune...
also i past the stage of learning to trade and
i am past the stage of looking at the charts all day.
qcharts you say? i don't think so...
and what is wrong with me testing how much ts pro can take?
what is the problem with testing the limits of the program?
bilo.
ps. on comstock charts i also track 5 different time frames
for the same symbol per chart and i can plug in any symbol
i want in about 5 seconds... so what??? does that give me a
real edge?
what would make me happy is if could run my system on at least
50 symbols that are in my porfolio with atcc working and alerts
working without delays.. so i don't have to look at the charts
and mental masturbate myself to death trying to figure out what to
do now... been there done that...
when your system is doing the workload for you that
on 50-100 symbols vs staring at qcharts all day... that's an edge.
just a different level on the evolution ladder, my friend :-)
and when this is accomplished than there is the next step,
better trading platfrom, better system, higher money level...
never ending process of evolving as a trader...
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Augustine <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: STRESS TESTING TS Pro Update...
> Sounds like great benchmark testing and its always interesting to read
> about technical limitations, but my question deals with what amount of
> resources a successful real-world trader really needs.
>
> I used TS4 for seven years and did very well with it -- I never upgraded
to
> TS2K for reasons that had nothing to do with Omega or TS, and eventually
> migrated to QCharts and other software.
>
> It is possible to do very well following very few issues. Several charts
> of the same issue in different time-frames-- with a few charts of
different
> issues running in the background just in case you need to look at them. I
> can call up a whole new array of charts of a different ticker symbol with
a
> few keystrokes --
>
> 50 or 80 charts with various indicators, systems, etc. -- WHY?
>
> My suggestion would be to spend more time learning to trade well-- not
> following multitudes of charts.
>
> Why try to stuff 100 people into a Volkswagen Beetle hoping that one or
two
> make it to the end of the road, when it probably makes much more sense to
> be selective about who you allow into the vehicle and how long they stay?
> ________________________________________
> At 06:21 PM 02/14/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >well,
> >i finally got tradestaion pro installed on '98, NT and Win2000.
> >here are some observations about win2000 ( i describe my
> >exploits in '98 and NT earlier ).
> >i decided to stress test Pro on win2000 brand new machine
> >with purpose of finding out if it's capable of trading a portfolio
> >consisting of about 50-100 symbols...
>
>
|