|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Sounds like great benchmark testing and its always interesting to read
about technical limitations, but my question deals with what amount of
resources a successful real-world trader really needs.
I used TS4 for seven years and did very well with it -- I never upgraded to
TS2K for reasons that had nothing to do with Omega or TS, and eventually
migrated to QCharts and other software.
It is possible to do very well following very few issues. Several charts
of the same issue in different time-frames-- with a few charts of different
issues running in the background just in case you need to look at them. I
can call up a whole new array of charts of a different ticker symbol with a
few keystrokes --
50 or 80 charts with various indicators, systems, etc. -- WHY?
My suggestion would be to spend more time learning to trade well-- not
following multitudes of charts.
Why try to stuff 100 people into a Volkswagen Beetle hoping that one or two
make it to the end of the road, when it probably makes much more sense to
be selective about who you allow into the vehicle and how long they stay?
________________________________________
At 06:21 PM 02/14/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>well,
>i finally got tradestaion pro installed on '98, NT and Win2000.
>here are some observations about win2000 ( i describe my
>exploits in '98 and NT earlier ).
>i decided to stress test Pro on win2000 brand new machine
>with purpose of finding out if it's capable of trading a portfolio
>consisting of about 50-100 symbols...
|