|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree with both views of this issue. While it is extremely valuable to
have a FAQ, and it would provide answers to many initial/basic questions, it
is also equally valuable to seek additional information/help from the list
if the info in the FAQ is outdated or doesn't completely answer your
question. Although a FAQ would be a great starting point and reduce the
amount of redundant, first time postings, it would need to be updated
frequently to reflect current conditions. -- optimum hardware, software,
data feeds and broker reliability change over time.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Augustine <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: Same old same old
>
> I couldn't disagree more -- Situations and technology are constantly
> changing -- whatever appeared to be valid last week may not be so today.
>
> Example: I recently posted a query inviting a comparison on two popular
> software firewalls. Result: a very concise and current evaluation of the
> subject by someone with a great depth of experience with both. The whole
> thread generated no more than about 5 messages.
>
> Also, I don't agree that anyone should take it upon himself to dictate
what
> others should be allowed to say, read, or respond to in a relatively
"free"
> forum --
> _______________________________________
> At 04:05 PM 07/08/2000 -0700, you wrote:
> >Yawn..... how many time must people ask the same old questions over and
> >over and over? Doesn't anybody READ this list or do they just delete
> >everything and wait until they want to know something and then fire
> >away. Data feeds, tick counts, what's the best computer, yada yada, blah
> >blah...... all this stuff gets rehashed at least once a month.
>
>
|