|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I tried CQGNet for -6 months. I used it alongside advancedGET for CGQNet.
I concluded that for my purposes it was not worth the money. It frequently
slowed my machine as it dowloaded some sort of update. The interface is
more cumbersome than it should be. The option add-on is not yet ready for
prime time.
on the other hand, it was very comprehensive (except that it covers only
1500 stocks). If you're into smaller, high flier trading you will be
disappointed.
A bug that drove me crazy was its odd habit of displaying tomorrow's value
of most indcators. Nice feature except that it wasn't really telling the
future. I never did discover what was going on.
It had another nice feature in that it would automatically bring up the near
contract.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Lin" <marvin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "omegalist" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: DSL questions for users of 2 or more computers
> Do you have experience with the recently released FutureSource/Bridge
> ProNET, the Internet-delivered version of Professional 3.0?
> http://pronet.futuresource.com/
>
> Besides, how about CQGNet? Is it really worth the $395/mo Base fee plus
> $60/mo Forex fee?
>
> > I'm usually connected to two internet quote feeds of 50-200 symbols,
> email,
> > and browser on my two trading machines. I keep a 56k ISP for backup and
> > have noticed that quotes arrive no sooner via DSL. I've compared
CQGNet,
> > myTrack, Quote.com, PCQuote this way and it just makes no difference. I
> > still prfer DSL for its other advantages however.
>
>
>
|