[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ANOTHER QUESTION


  • To: "[ tradergirl ]" <tradergirl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: ANOTHER QUESTION
  • From: "Monte C. Smith" <mcs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 07:37:42 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <NABBKIICILGAKIPAGKHFKEDMDAAA.mtepper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I am sorry to have wasted the kist's time with so many useless
messages, TraderGirl. I will try to be more like you in the future.



[ tradergirl ] wrote:
> 
> Why even post useless messages like this re: my views?
> I made a remark on the Nasdaq, and you pinpoint one line and try to defeat
> the positivity of that reply.
> 
> Get a life Monte, same with Russ.  You guys really need to stop trying to
> challenge me, considering neither of you are traders.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Monte C. Smith" <mcs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "[ tradergirl ]" <tradergirl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Omega-List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 7:01 AM
> Subject: Re: ANOTHER QUESTION
> 
> > "Yeah, so?"
> >
> > Ah, sorry, but this reply is meaningless. Does the "Yeah" part mean you
> > do view each stock as a separate commodity, and that there are therefore
> > too many of them to apply a single system to? And does the "SO?" part
> > indicate that you wish to challenge me, if my view differs from
> > yours?(That's fine, but I doubt my interest level can support a
> > prolonged dialog).
> > (I shouldn't get into this, as I am sure to lose interest in short
> > time).
> > I assume we're done now with citizenship issues? (If not, please don't
> > discuss them with me unless you are prepared for a deafening silence. I
> > don't give a damn about those issues. If I did, I'd join a suitable
> > list).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Monte
> >
> > [ tradergirl ] wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, so?
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Monte C. Smith" <mcs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Omega-List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 9:19 PM
> > > Subject: Re: ANOTHER QUESTION
> > >
> > > > Why? Because 'each stock is a different commodity?'
> > > >
> > > > [ tradergirl ] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Brian/Louise Garnant" <babakid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: "[ tradergirl ]" <tradergirl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > >
> > > > > Thank god I am not a stock investor.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Monte
> > > >